Secondary Piggyback Intraocular Lens for Management of Residual Ametropia after Cataract Surgery
- PMID: 33520123
- PMCID: PMC7841270
- DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v16i1.8244
Secondary Piggyback Intraocular Lens for Management of Residual Ametropia after Cataract Surgery
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the indications, clinical outcomes, and complications of secondary piggyback intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for correcting residual refractive error after cataract surgery.
Methods: In this prospective interventional case series, patients who had residual refractive error after cataract surgery and were candidates for secondary piggyback IOL implantation between June 2015 and September 2018 were included. All eyes underwent secondary IOL implantation with the piggyback technique in the ciliary sulcus. The types of IOLs included Sulcoflex and three-piece foldable acrylic lenses. Patients were followed-up for at least one year.
Results: Eleven patients were included. Seven patients had hyperopic ametropia, and four patients had residual myopia after cataract surgery. The preoperative mean of absolute residual refractive error was 7.20 7.92, which reached 0.42 1.26 postoperatively (P 0.001). The postoperative spherical equivalent was within 1 diopter of target refraction in all patients. The average preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.13 0.35 LogMAR, which significantly improved to 0.41 0.24 LogMAR postoperatively (P = 0.008). There were no intra- or postoperative complications during the 22.4 9.5 months of follow-up.
Conclusion: Secondary piggyback IOL implantation is an effective and safe technique for the correction of residual ametropia following cataract surgery. Three-piece IOLs can be safely placed as secondary piggyback IOLs in situations where specifically designed IOLs are not available.
Keywords: Intraocular Lens Implantation; Piggyback IOL Implantation; Residual Ametropia.
Copyright © 2021 Karjou et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Secondary piggyback implantation versus IOL exchange for symptomatic pseudophakic residual ametropia.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;251(7):1861-6. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2283-x. Epub 2013 Feb 16. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23417295
-
Piggyback intraocular lens implantation to correct pseudophakic refractive error after segmental multifocal intraocular lens implantation.J Refract Surg. 2014 Apr;30(4):234-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140321-02. J Refract Surg. 2014. PMID: 24702574
-
Polypseudophakia: from "Piggyback" to supplementary sulcus-fixated IOLs.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;263(3):603-624. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06618-3. Epub 2024 Sep 11. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39259300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Refractive Results: Safety and Efficacy of Secondary Piggyback Sensar™ AR40 Intraocular Lens Implantation to Correct Pseudophakic Refractive Error.J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:4505812. doi: 10.1155/2016/4505812. Epub 2016 May 30. J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27313869 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical options for correction of refractive error following cataract surgery.Eye Vis (Lond). 2014 Oct 16;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s40662-014-0002-2. eCollection 2014. Eye Vis (Lond). 2014. PMID: 26605349 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Primary Duet Lens Procedures: In-The-Bag Monofocal with Sulcus Multifocal, and Standard Single Multifocal Lens for Cataract Surgery.Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 19;17:273-282. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S396472. eCollection 2023. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36698853 Free PMC article.
-
Refractive and Visual Outcomes After Implantation of a Secondary Sulcus Intraocular Lens with an Extended Depth of Focus.Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 9;16:1861-1869. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S366145. eCollection 2022. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35711970 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Basarir B, Kaya V, Altan C, Karakus S, Pinarci EY, Demirok A. The use of a supplemental sulcus fixated IOL (HumanOptics Add-On IOL) to correct pseudophakic refractive errors. European journal of ophthalmology 2012; 22: 898-903. - PubMed
-
- Alio JL, Abdelghany AA and Fernández-Buenaga R. Management of residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Current opinion in ophthalmology 2014; 25: 291-297. - PubMed
-
- Jin SX and Lee JK. Refractive surgical corrective options after cataract surgery. Annals of Eye Science 2019; 4.
-
- El Awady HE and Ghanem AA. Secondary piggyback implantation versus IOL exchange for symptomatic pseudophakic residual ametropia. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2013; 251: 1861-1866. - PubMed
-
- Gayton JL and Sanders VN. Implanting two posterior chamber intraocular lenses in a case of microphthalmos. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 1993; 19: 776-777. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources