Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 7:2021:8832538.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8832538. eCollection 2021.

Revision Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole after Failed Primary Vitrectomy

Affiliations

Revision Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole after Failed Primary Vitrectomy

Alexandre Lachance et al. J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the anatomical and functional outcomes of revision surgery after failed primary surgery for idiopathic macular hole (MH).

Methods: All consecutive patients with MH were identified from a cohort of patients operated between 2014 and 2018 at the CHU de Québec-Université Laval (Québec). The clinical and anatomical features of patients with unclosed MH after primary surgery were retrospectively collected. Our primary outcome was MH nonclosure rate after revision surgery. Our secondary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with ETDRS scale and MH size of eyes with revision surgery preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months after revision surgery.

Results: In our cohort of 1085 eyes, 926 eyes met inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the study. We identified 22 eyes with failed primary surgery (2.4%), of which 20 underwent revision surgery. We had no bilateral MH in these 22 eyes. The nonclosure rate of MH after revision surgery was 15%. The mean final BCVA for closed MH after revision surgery was 55 ± 19 letters. Compared to the initial presentation, the mean change in visual acuity (VA) for closed MH was +4 ± 31 letters and +16 ± 17 letters at 3 and 12 months after the revision surgery, respectively. At initial presentation, patients with failed primary surgery had a baseline MH size of 665 ± 226 μm. The mean MH size after failed primary surgery was 607 ± 162 μm and 546 ± 156 μm for the three unclosed MHs one month after revision surgery.

Conclusion: The success rate of revision surgery in eyes with unclosed MH is 85%. After successful revision surgery, eyes demonstrated an improvement in VA and closure of the MH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing the management process of eyes undergoing primary and revision surgery. MH: macular hole.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preoperative and postoperative OCT scans. (a) Preoperative OCT scan of an eye with a VA of 41 letters (6/45). (b) OCT scan of an eye prerevision surgery with a VA of hand motion. (c-d) OCT scans 3 and 12 months after successful revision surgery with a VA of counting fingers for both.

References

    1. Parravano M., Giansanti F., Eandi C. M., et al. Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;2015(5) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009080.pub2.CD009080 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gaudric A., Tadayoni R. Chapter 117-macular hole. In: Ryan S. J., editor. Retina. 5th. Philadelphia, PA, USA: W. B. Saunders; 2013. pp. 1962–1978.
    1. Yek J. T. O., Hunyor A. P., Campbell W. G., et al. Outcomes of eyes with failed primary surgery for idiopathic macular hole. Ophthalmology Retina. 2018;2(8):757–764. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.10.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reid G. A., McDonagh N., Wright D. M., Yek J. T. O., Essex R. W., Lois N. First failed macular hole surgery or reopening of a previously closed hole. Retina. 2020;40(1):1–15. doi: 10.1097/iae.0000000000002564. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duker J. S., Kaiser P. K., Binder S., et al. The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2611–2619. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.042. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources