Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 29;12(12):e12361.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.12361.

Total Posterior Spinal Arthroplasty Systems for Dynamic Stability

Affiliations
Review

Total Posterior Spinal Arthroplasty Systems for Dynamic Stability

Brian Fiani et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine commonly develops with age and can cause debilitating pain or neurologic deficits. When minimally invasive treatments and pain management interventions fail to provide relief, the traditional treatment has consisted of decompression surgery followed by the possible need for lumbar fusion. A mechanical implant device, known as a Total Posterior Spine (TOPS) System, has been introduced as a potential dynamic alternative to fusion surgery following decompression. The device is a dynamic posterior arthroplasty via pedicle screw insertion that maintains mobility, flexibility, and range of motion by providing multiaxial, three-column stabilization. While currently approved for use in Europe, the device is undergoing clinical trials in the United States to determine efficacy and potential complications. This paper provides a comprehensive narrative review of this technique's mechanism, early clinical outcomes, and considerations for patient selection. A review of the literature identified both positive results and adverse effects. While TOPS' use shows excellent potential, additional prospective trials are needed to determine this system's long-term complications.

Keywords: back pain; chronic low back pain (clbp); degenerative spine disease; dynamic motion; lumbar arthroplasty; lumbar spinal stenosis (lss); lumbar-fusion; preserve motion; spinal decompression; spinal-fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Lumbar spine fusion: what is the evidence? Harris IA, Traeger A, Stanford R, et al. Intern Med J. 2018;48:1430–1434. - PubMed
    1. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K, Reilly J. Spine. 1978;3:319–328. - PubMed
    1. Low back pain. the role of spine fusion. Frymoyer JW. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1840395/ Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1991;2:933–954. - PubMed
    1. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2257–2270. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N, et al. Spine. 2019;44:369–376. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources