Effort-Related Decision-Making in ADHD
- PMID: 33521326
- PMCID: PMC7842264
- DOI: 10.20900/jpbs.20200027
Effort-Related Decision-Making in ADHD
Abstract
ADHD is defined by behavioral symptoms that are not well characterized in relation to ADHD's neurobiological mechanisms. This approach has limited our ability to define ADHD nosology and predict outcomes because it does not systematically examine facets of the disorder such as the inability to maintain cognitively effortful activities, as promoted in the NIMH RDoC approach. Existing data indicate ADHD is associated with differences in reward valuation and processing, but we do not know whether ADHD is also associated with higher levels of aversion to exerting cognitive effort and/or altered reward x effort interactions. Our ongoing study addresses this knowledge gap by examining individuals' preferences between rewards associated with minimal effort and reward alternatives with a higher payoff but higher effort costs ("effort discounting"); thereby permitting us to characterize differences in biases and tradeoffs during effort-related decision-making in ADHD. The study takes advantage of a well-defined sample of ADHD-diagnosed and healthy control individuals to address three aims. First, we determine whether ADHD is associated with steeper discounting of larger, more effortful rewards. Second, we examine the subjective perception of effort in youth diagnosed with ADHD and healthy controls using tasks requiring varying levels of cognitive effort. Third, we explore relationships amongst indices of effort discounting, theoretically-related traits (e.g., grit, distress tolerance), biomarkers of effort-related decision-making (eye movements and pupil size), and various cognitive measures. Successful completion of the aims will permit us to better characterize ADHD-healthy control differences and lay a foundation for more computational approaches to ADHD diagnostic criteria.
Keywords: ADHD; attention; cognitive effort; decision-making; effort discounting; executive function; motivation; working memory.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest associated with this project.
Figures



References
-
- National Institute of Mental Health. RDoC Constructs U.S.Department of Health and Human Services. Available from: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/research/research-funded-by-nimh/rdoc/construct.... Accessed 2020 Dec 23.
-
- Mitchell SH. Devaluation of Outcomes Due to Their Cost: Extending Discounting Models Beyond Delay In: Stevens JR, editor. Impulsivity. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 145–61. - PubMed
-
- Mitchell SH. Discounting the Value of Commodities According to Different Types of Cost In: Vuchinich RE, Heather N, editors. Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Pergamon; 2003. p. 339–62.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous