Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 4;5(1):rkaa073.
doi: 10.1093/rap/rkaa073. eCollection 2021.

Efficacy and safety of urate-lowering therapy in people with kidney impairment: a GCAN-initiated literature review

Affiliations
Review

Efficacy and safety of urate-lowering therapy in people with kidney impairment: a GCAN-initiated literature review

Hamish Farquhar et al. Rheumatol Adv Pract. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy, defined as achieving target serum urate <6.0 mg/dl, and safety of urate-lowering therapies (ULTs) for people with gout and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5.

Methods: PubMed, The Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched from 1 January 1959 to 31 January 2018 for studies that enrolled people with gout, who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or creatinine clearance (CrCl) of <60 ml/min and exposure to allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, benzbromarone, lesinurad or pegloticase. All study designs other than case reports were included, except for people on dialysis, for whom we did include case reports.

Results: There were 36 reports with an analysis of efficacy and/or safety based upon renal function: allopurinol (n = 12), febuxostat (n = 10), probenecid (n = 3), benzbromarone (n = 5), lesinurad (n = 5) and pegloticase (n = 1). There were 108 reports that involved people with gout and renal impairment but did not contain any analysis on efficacy and/or safety based upon renal function: allopurinol (n = 84), febuxostat (n = 14), benzbromarone (n = 1), lesinurad (n = 3) and pegloticase (n = 6). Most studies excluded people with more severe degrees of renal impairment (eGFR or CrCl of <30 ml/min). For allopurinol, in particular, there was significant variability in the dose of drug used and the efficacy in terms of urate lowering, across all levels of renal impairment.

Conclusion: There is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy and/or safety of currently used ULTs according to different levels of renal function. Future studies should include patients with CKD and should report study outcomes stratified by renal function.

Keywords: chronic; chronic kidney disease; gout; gout suppressants; renal insufficiency; urate-lowering therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roughley M, Belcher J, Mallen C, Roddy E.. Gout and risk of chronic kidney disease and nephrolithiasis: meta-analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Res Ther 2015;17:90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krishnan E. Reduced glomerular function and prevalence of gout: NHANES 2009–10. PLoS One 2012;7:e50046. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson R. Why focus on uric acid? Curr Med Res Opin 2015;31:3–7. - PubMed
    1. Fuldeore MJ, Riedel AA, Zarotsky V. et al. Chronic kidney disease in gout in a managed care setting. BMC Nephrol 2011;12:36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stamp L, Chapman P, Barclay M. et al. A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of allopurinol dose escalation to achieve target serum urate in people with gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1522–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources