Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 26;1(1):CD011561.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011561.pub2.

Band ligation versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

Lorena I Cifuentes  1 , Daniela Gattini  2 , Romina Torres-Robles  3 , Juan Cristóbal Gana  2
Affiliations

Band ligation versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

Lorena I Cifuentes et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Portal hypertension commonly accompanies advanced liver disease and often gives rise to life-threatening complications, including bleeding (haemorrhage) from oesophageal and gastrointestinal varices. Variceal bleeding commonly occurs in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Prevention is, therefore, important. Randomised clinical trials have shown that non-selective beta-blockers and endoscopic variceal band ligation decrease the incidence of variceal bleeding in adults. In children and adolescents, band ligation, beta-blockers, and sclerotherapy have been proposed as primary prophylaxis alternatives for oesophageal variceal bleeding. However, it is unknown whether these interventions are of benefit or harm when used for primary prophylaxis in children and adolescents.

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of band ligation compared with sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and two other databases (April 2020). We scrutinised the reference lists of the retrieved publications, and we also handsearched abstract books of the two main paediatric gastroenterology and hepatology conferences from January 2008 to December 2019. We also searched clinicaltrials.gov, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the World Health Organization (WHO) for ongoing clinical trials. We imposed no language or document type restrictions on our search.

Selection criteria: We aimed to include randomised clinical trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, to assess the benefits and harms of band ligation versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. If the search for randomised clinical trials retrieved quasi-randomised and other observational studies, then we read them through to extract information on harm.

Data collection and analysis: We used standard Cochrane methodology to perform this systematic review. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and liver-related morbidity, and quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were oesophageal variceal bleeding and adverse events not considered serious. We used the intention-to-treat principle. We analysed data using Review Manager 5.

Main results: One conference abstract, describing a feasibility multi-centre randomised clinical trial, fulfilled our review inclusion criteria. We judged the trial at overall high risk of bias. This trial was conducted in three hospital centres in the United Kingdom. The aim of the trial was to determine the feasibility and safety of further larger randomised clinical trials of prophylactic band ligation versus no active treatment in children with portal hypertension and large oesophageal varices. Twelve children received prophylactic band ligation and 10 children received no active treatment. There was no information on the age of the children included, or about the diagnosis of any child included. All children were followed up for at least six months. Mortality was 8% (1/12) in the band ligation group versus 0% (0/10) in the no active intervention group (risk ratio (RR) 2.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 56.25; very low certainty of evidence). The abstract did not report when the death occurred, but we assume it happened between the six-month follow-up and one year. No child (0%) in the band ligation group developed adverse events (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.01 to 6.25; very low certainty of evidence) but one child out of 10 (10%) in the no active intervention group developed idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura. One child out of 12 (8%) in the band ligation group underwent liver transplantation versus none in the no active intervention group (0%) (RR 2.54, 95% CI 0.11 to 56.25; very low certainty of evidence). The trial reported no other serious adverse events or liver-related morbidity. Quality of life was not reported. Oesophageal variceal bleeding occurred in 8% (1/12) of the children in the band ligation group versus 30% (3/10) of the children in the no active intervention group (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.27; very low certainty of evidence). No adverse events considered non-serious were reported. Two children were lost to follow-up by one-year. Ten children in total completed the trial at two-year follow-up. There was no information on funding. We found two observational studies on endoscopic variceal ligation when searching for randomised trials. One found no harm, and the other reported E nterobacter cloacae septicaemia in one child and mild, transient, upper oesophageal sphincter stenosis in another. We did not assess these studies for risk of bias. We did not find any ongoing randomised clinical trials of interest to our review.

Authors' conclusions: The evidence, obtained from only one feasibility randomised clinical trial at high risk of bias, is very scanty. It is very uncertain about whether prophylactic band ligation versus sham or no (active) intervention may affect mortality, serious adverse events and liver-related morbidity, or oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with portal hypertension and large oesophageal varices. We have no data on quality of life. No adverse events considered non-serious were reported. The results presented in the trial need to be interpreted with caution. In addition, the highly limited data cover only part of our research question; namely, children with portal hypertension and large oesophageal varices. Data on children with portal vein thrombosis are lacking. Larger randomised clinical trials assessing the benefits and harms of band ligation compared with sham treatment for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis are needed. The trials should include important clinical outcomes such as death, quality of life, failure to control bleeding, and adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LC: none to declare. DG: none to declare. RTR: none to declare. JCG: none to declare.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram. Date of search 27 April 2020.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1: Band ligation versus sham or no intervention, Outcome 1: All‐cause mortality
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1: Band ligation versus sham or no intervention, Outcome 2: Serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1: Band ligation versus sham or no intervention, Outcome 3: Oesophageal variceal bleeding
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

McKiernan 2011 {published and unpublished data}
    1. McKiernan PJ, Van Mourik ID, Dhawan A, Grammatikopoulos T, Davenport M, Davison SM, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled pilot trial of variceal band ligation for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in childhood portal hypertension. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2011;52:E189-90.

References to studies excluded from this review

Celinska‐Cedro 2003 {published data only}
    1. Celinska-Cedro D, Teisseyre M, Woynarowski M, Socha P, Socha J, Ryzko J. Endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices for prophylaxis of first bleeding in children and adolescents with portal hypertension: preliminary results of a prospective study. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2003;38(7):1008-11. [PMID: ] - PubMed
De BK, 1999 {published data only}
    1. De BK, Ghoshal UC, Das T, Santra A, Biswas PK. Endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleed: preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 1999;14(3):220-4. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Galand 2018 {published data only}
    1. Galand J, Ley D, Coopman S, Michaud L, Guimber D, Turck D, et al. Primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children by ligation is safe and as efficient as secondary prophylaxis. Journal of Hepatology 2018;68(3):600-1. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Grothaus 2010 {published data only}
    1. Grothaus J, Petrasch F, Zeynalova S, Mossner J, Schiefke I, Hoffmeister A. Risk factors for bleeding complications after endoscopic variceal ligation therapy. Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 2010;48(10):1200-6. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Lay 1997 {published data only}
    1. Lay CS, Tsai YT, Teg CY, Shyu WS, Guo WS, Wu KL, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation in prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high-risk esophageal varices. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 1997;25(6):1346-50. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Lo 1999 {published data only}
    1. Lo GH, Lai KH, Cheng JS, Lin CK, Hsu PI, Chiang HT. Prophylactic banding ligation of high-risk esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of Hepatology 1999;31(3):451-6. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Nijhawan 1995 {published data only}
    1. Nijhawan S, Patni T, Sharma U, Rai RR, Miglani N. Endoscopic variceal ligation in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 1995;30(10):1455-6. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Ouakaa‐Kchaou 2011 {published data only}
    1. Ouakaa-Kchaou A, Kharrat J, Mir K, Houda B, Abdelli N, Ajmi S, et al. Variceal band ligation in the prevention of variceal bleeding: a multicenter trial. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology 2011;17(2):105-9. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Bozic 2015
    1. Bozic MA, Puri K, Molleston JP. Screening and prophylaxis for varices in children with liver disease. Current Gastroenterology Reports 2015;17(7):27. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Chan 2013
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2013;346:e7586. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Chapin 2018
    1. Chapin CA, Bass LM. Cirrhosis and portal hypertension in the pediatric population. Clinics in Liver Disease 2018;22(4):735-52. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Cifuentes 2021
    1. Cifuentes LI, Gattini D, Torres-Robles R, Gana JC. Beta-blockers versus placebo or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 1. Art. No: CD011973. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011973.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
de Franchis 2015
    1. de Franchis R, Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. Journal of Hepatology 2015;63:743–52. - PubMed
Di Giorgio 2019
    1. Di Giorgio A, De Angelis P, Cheli M, Vajro P, Iorio R, Cananzi M, et al. Etiology, presenting features and outcome of children with non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis: a multicentre national study. Digestive and Liver Disease 2019;51(8):1179-84. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Duche 2010
    1. Duche M, Ducot B, Tournay E, Fabre M, Cohen J, Jacquemin E, et al. Prognostic value of endoscopy in children with biliary atresia at risk for early development of varices and bleeding. Gastroenterology 2010;139(6):1952-60. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Duche 2013
    1. Duche M, Ducot B, Ackermann O, Baujard C, Chevret L, Frank-Soltysiak M, et al. Experience with endoscopic management of high-risk gastroesophageal varices, with and without bleeding, in children with biliary atresia. Gastroenterology 2013;145(4):801-7. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Duche 2017
    1. Duche M, Ducot B, Ackermann O, Guerin F, Jacquemin E, Bernard O. Portal hypertension in children: high-risk varices, primary prophylaxis and consequences of bleeding. Journal of Hepatology 2017;66(2):320-7. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Ebel 2019
    1. Ebel NH, Carlin K, Shaffer ML, Shivaram G, Hawkins M, Lane ER, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements in children: correlation with hepatic histology and clinical indicators of portal hypertension. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2019;68(6):788-92. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Eroglu 2004
    1. Eroglu Y, Emerick KM, Whitingon PF, Alonso EM. Octreotide therapy for control of acute gastrointestinal bleeding in children. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2004;38(1):41-7. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Gana 2010
    1. Gana JC, Turner D, Roberts EA, Ling SC. Derivation of a clinical prediction rule for the noninvasive diagnosis of varices in children. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2010;50(2):188-93. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Gana 2011a
    1. Gana JC, Valentino PL, Morinville V, O'Connor C, Ling SC. Variation in care for children with esophageal varices: a study of physicians', patients', and families' approaches and attitudes. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2011;52(6):751-5. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Gana 2011b
    1. Gana JC, Turner D, Mieli-Vergani G, Davenport M, Miloh T, Avitzur Y, et al. A clinical prediction rule and platelet count predict esophageal varices in children. Gastroenterology 2011;141(6):2009-16. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Gana 2019
    1. Gana JC, Cifuentes LI, Gattini D, Villarroel Del Pino LA, Pena A, Torres-Robles R. Band ligation versus beta-blockers for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019, Issue 9. Art. No: CD010546. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010546.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Gana 2020
    1. Gana JC, Cifuentes LI, Gattini D, Torres-Robles R. Band ligation versus sclerotherapy for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 11. Art. No: CD011803. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011803.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Garcia‐Tsao 2007
    1. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey WD. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2007;102(9):2086-102. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Garcia‐Tsao 2008
    1. Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Groszmann RJ. Portal hypertension and variceal bleeding - unresolved issues. Summary of an American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and European Association for the Study of the Liver single-topic conference. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2008;47(5):1764-72. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Garcia‐Tsao 2017
    1. Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2017;65(1):310-35. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Gattini 2020a
    1. Gattini D, Cifuentes LI, Torres-Robles R, Gana JC. Sclerotherapy versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 3. Art. No: CD011573. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011573.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Gattini 2020b
    1. Gattini D, Cifuentes LI, Torres-Robles R, Gana JC. Sclerotherapy versus beta-blockers for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 1. Art. No: CD011659. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011659.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Gluud 2012
    1. Gluud LL, Krag A. Banding ligation versus beta-blockers for primary prevention in oesophageal varices in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8. Art. No: CD004544. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004544.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Goncalves 2000
    1. Goncalves ME, Cardoso SR, Maksoud JG. Prophylactic sclerotherapy in children with esophageal varices: long-term results of a controlled prospective randomized trial. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2000;35(3):401-5. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Gonçalves 2000
    1. Gonçalves ME , Cardoso SR, Maksoud JG. Prophylactic sclerotherapy in children with esophageal varices: long-term results of a controlled prospective randomized trial. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2000;35(3):401-5. [PMID: ] - PubMed
GRADEpro GDT [Computer program]
    1. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime) GRADEpro GDT. Version accessed 4 May 2020. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), 2015. Available at gradepro.org.
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2003;327(7414):557-60. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Higgins 2020
    1. Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
ICH‐GCP 1997
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice CFR & ICH Guidelines. Vol. 1. Philadelphia (PA): Barnett International/PAREXEL, 1997.
Imperiale 2001
    1. Imperiale TF, Chalasani N. A meta-analysis of endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2001;33(4):802-7. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Jakobsen 2014
    1. Jakobsen J, Wetterslev J, Winkel P, Lange T, Gluud C. Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014;14:120. - PMC - PubMed
Jeanniard‐Malet 2017
    1. Jeanniard-Malet O, Duche M, Fabre A. Survey on clinical practice of primary prophylaxis in portal hypertension in children. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2017;64(4):524-7. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Kamath 2001
    1. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau TM, Kosberg CL, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2001;33(2):464-70. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Kjaergard 2001
    1. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001;135(11):982-9. - PubMed
Lee 2017
    1. Lee WS, Ong SY, Foo HW, Wong SY, Kong CX, Seah RB, et al. Chronic liver disease is universal in children with biliary atresia living with native liver. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2017;23(43):7776-84. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Ling 2011
    1. Ling SC, Walters T, McKiernan PJ, Schwarz KB, Garcia-Tsao G, Shneider BL. Primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage in children with portal hypertension: a framework for future research. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2011;52(3):254-61. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Lundh 2017
    1. Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 2. Art. No: MR000033. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Lykavieris 2000
    1. Lykavieris P, Gauthier F, Hadchouel P, Duche M, Bernard O. Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding during adolescence and early adulthood in children with portal vein obstruction. Journal of Pediatrics 2000;136(6):805-8. [PMID: ] - PubMed
McDiarmid 2002
    1. McDiarmid SV, Anand R, Lindblad AS. Development of a pediatric end-stage liver disease score to predict poor outcome in children awaiting liver transplantation. Transplantation 2002;74(2):173-81. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Miga 2001
    1. Miga D, Sokol RJ, Mackenzie T, Narkewicz MR, Smith D, Karrer FM. Survival after first esophageal variceal hemorrhage in patients with biliary atresia. Journal of Pediatrics 2001;139(2):291-6. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Mileti 2011
    1. Mileti E, Rosenthal P. Management of portal hypertension in children. Current Gastroenterology Reports 2011;13(1):10-6. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Moher 1998
    1. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998;352(9128):609-13. - PubMed
PCORI 2012
    1. Basch E, Aronson N, Berg A, Flum D, Gabriel S, Goodman SN, et al. Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective. JAMA 2012;307(15):1636-40. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Pimenta 2016
    1. Pimenta JR, Ferreira AR, Bittencourt PF, Resende CB, Fagundes ED, Silva IM. Evaluation of primary prophylaxis with propranolol and elastic band ligation in variceal bleeding in cirrhotic children and adolescents. Archives of Gastroenterology 2016;53(4):257-61. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Pugh 1973
    1. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. British Journal of Surgery 1973;60(8):646-9. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Quintero 2019
    1. Quintero J, Juampérez J, Mercadal-Hally M, Julio E, Ortega J, Molino JA, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation as primary prophylaxis for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2019;68(Suppl 1):706.
Quintero 2020
    1. Quintero J, Juampérez J, Mercadal-Hally M, King ML, Ortega J, Molino JA, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation as primary prophylaxis for upper GI bleeding in children. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020;92(2):269-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.035] - DOI - PubMed
Review Manager 2014 [Computer program]
    1. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Royle 2003
    1. Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591-603. - PubMed
Savović 2012a
    1. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(6):429-38. - PubMed
Savović 2012b
    1. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment 2012;16(35):1-82. - PubMed
Savović 2018
    1. Savović J, Turner RM, Mawdsley D, Jones HE, Beynon R, Higgins JP, et al. Association between risk-of-bias assessments and results of randomized trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2018;187(5):1113-22. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408-12. - PubMed
Shneider 2004
    1. Shneider, BL. Approaches to the management of pediatric portal hypertension: results of an informal survey. In: Groszmann RJ, Bosch J, editors(s). Portal Hypertension in the 21st Century. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004:167-72.
Shneider 2012a
    1. Shneider BL, Bosch J, Franchis R, Emre SH, Groszmann RJ, Ling SC, et al. Portal hypertension in children: expert pediatric opinion on the report of the Baveno V Consensus Workshop on Methodology of Diagnosis and Therapy in Portal Hypertension. Pediatric Transplantation 2012;16(5):426-37. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Shneider 2012b
    1. Shneider BL, Abel B, Haber B, Karpen SJ, Magee JC, Romero R, et al. Portal hypertension in children and young adults with biliary atresia. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2012;55(5):567-73. [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Shneider 2016
    1. Shneider BL, Ville de Goyet J, Leung DH, Srivastava A, Ling SC, Duche M, et al. Primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in children and the role of MesoRex Bypass: summary of the Baveno VI Pediatric Satellite Symposium. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2016;63(4):1368-80. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Storebø 2018
    1. Storebø OJ, Pedersen N, Ramstad E, Kielsholm ML, Nielsen SS, Krogh HB, et al. Methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents – assessment of adverse events in non-randomised studies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 5. Art. No: CD012069. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012069.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Stringer 1989
    1. Stringer MD, Howard ER, Mowat AP. Endoscopic sclerotherapy in the management of esophageal varices in 61 children with biliary atresia. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 1989;24(5):438-42. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Thorlund 2017
    1. Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual for Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA). https://ctu.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/tsa_manual_ENG.pdf 2017 (accessed 13 January 2021).
TSA 2011 [Computer program]
    1. Copenhagen Trial Unit TSA - Trial Sequential Analysis. Version 0.9.5.10 Beta. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Trial Unit, 2011. www.ctu.dk/tsa/downloads.aspx.
Van Heurn 2004
    1. Van Heurn LW, Saing H, Tam PK. Portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: long-term survival and prognosis after esophageal variceal bleeding. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2004;39(1):6-9. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Van Wessel 2018
    1. Van Wessel DB, Witt M, Bax N, Verkade HJ, Scheenstra R, De Kleine RH, et al. Variceal bleeds in patients with biliary atresia. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2018;28(5):439-44. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Verdaguer 2016
    1. Verdaguer D S, Gana A JC. [Management of pediatric patients with esophageal varices] [Enfrentamiento de pacientes pediatricos con varices esofagicas]. Revista Medica de Chile 2016;144(7):879-85. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Wetterslev 2008
    1. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(1):64-75. - PubMed
Wetterslev 2009
    1. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in a random-effects meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009;9:86. - PMC - PubMed
Wetterslev 2017
    1. Wetterslev J, Jakobsen JC, Gluud C. Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2017;17(1):39. - PMC - PubMed
Wood 2008
    1. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman GD, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008;336:601-5. - PMC - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Gana 2015
    1. Gana JC, Cifuentes LI, Cerda J, Villarroel del Pino LA, Peña A, Rivera-Cornejo M. Banding ligation versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 3. Art. No: CD011561. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011561] - DOI

Publication types