Evaluation of safety and foeto-maternal outcome following non-obstetric surgery in pregnancy: a retrospective single-site Australian study
- PMID: 33522680
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.16617
Evaluation of safety and foeto-maternal outcome following non-obstetric surgery in pregnancy: a retrospective single-site Australian study
Abstract
Background: Existing data on safety of non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy appear limited and conflicting. This study aimed to assess perinatal outcomes and complications in pregnant women undergoing non-obstetric surgeries.
Methods: A single-site Australian study was performed utilizing a 10-year data (2009-2018) collected retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of the study population. Statistical analyses between groups were conducted by independent t-test or Mann-Whitney (for means between groups) and by chi-squared/Fisher's exact test (for categorical variables).
Results: A total of 108 pregnant women underwent non-obstetric surgery, with an increasing trend in annual numbers since 2014. The majority of women (91%) underwent surgeries as an emergency procedure, and under general anaesthesia (69.8%). Procedures during the first trimester comprised 45%, making it the most common trimester for non-obstetric surgeries. The most common cause for surgery arose in the gastrointestinal/digestive tract (39%). Overall perinatal complication rate was 19% with the rate of miscarriage/foetal loss, preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age being 4.7%, 10.4% and 3.8%, respectively. A total of 46 patients underwent intra-abdominal surgery. The most common surgery in the laparoscopy group was appendicectomy (56%), whereas adnexal pathology (54%) contributed to the majority of laparotomies. Subgroup comparison showed no significant difference in perinatal outcomes except for caesarean delivery rate (24% versus 67% for laparoscopy versus open, respectively (P = 0.04)).
Conclusion: With an overall perinatal complication rate of 19%, the rate of adverse perinatal outcomes following non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy in our study was low and comparable to those of the general population.
Keywords: laparoscopy; pregnancy; surgery.
© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- Reitman E, Flood P. Anaesthetic considerations for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy. Br. J. Anaesth. 2011; 107 (Suppl. 1): i72-8.
-
- Balinskaite RV, Bottle JA, Sodhi JV et al. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes following nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy: estimates from a retrospective cohort study of 6.5 million pregnancies. Ann. Surg. 2017; 266: 260-6.
-
- Reedy MB, Källén B, Kuehl TJ. Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a study of five fetal outcome parameters with use of the Swedish Health Registry. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997; 177: 673-9.
-
- Ibiebele I, Schnitzler M, Nippita T, Ford JB. Appendicectomy during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: a population data linkage study. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019; 59: 45-53.
-
- Ibiebele I, Schnitzler M, Nippita T, Ford JB. Outcomes of gallstone disease during pregnancy: a population-based data linkage study (report). Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2017; 31: 522-30.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical