Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;36(1):307-313.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08276-y. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

Current status of robotic surgery in colorectal residency training programs

Adam D Shellito  1 , Sonam Kapadia  1 , Amy H Kaji  2   3 , Cynthia M Tom  1 , Christine Dauphine  1   2 , Beverley A Petrie  4   5
Affiliations

Current status of robotic surgery in colorectal residency training programs

Adam D Shellito et al. Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Robotic surgery (RS) has been increasingly incorporated into colorectal surgery (CRS) training. The degree to which RS has been integrated into CRS residency training is not well described.

Methods: A web-based survey was sent to all 2019 accredited CRS residency programs within the United States and Canada. Program directors (PDs) were queried on how robotic surgery had been integrated into their program, specifics on RS curriculum and opinions on RS training during general surgery residency. We compared survey responses by program type (university-based, university-affiliated programs, or independent programs) and by geographic region. In addition, a chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in survey responses with respect to robotic curriculum components.

Results: Of 66 programs, 42 (64%) responded to the survey. Of the responding programs, 35 (83%) were university-based or university-affiliated, while 7 (17%) were independent. Most programs were in the Midwest (33%). Forty-one (98%) reported having a surgical robot in use at their institution, with 95% reporting active participation of CRS residents in RS. While 74% of programs have a formal RS training curriculum for CRS residents, there was considerable variability in the curriculum elements employed by each institution, and the differences in proportions of these elements were significant (χ2 99.8, p < 0.001). The median operative approach to abdominopelvic cases was estimated to be 33% robotic, 40% laparoscopic and 20% open. There were no significant differences in the survey responses between university/university-affiliated and independent programs (p > 0.05) or among the different regions (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that almost all CRS residencies have integrated RS and have trainees operating at the robotic console. Most programs have a robotics curriculum and there are expanding indications for RS within CRS. This expansion calls for discussion on implementation of training standards such as curricular requisites, baseline competency assessments, and definitions of minimum case requirements to ensure adequate training.

Keywords: Colorectal; Minimally invasive surgery; Residency; Robotic curriculum; Robotic surgery; Simulation; Surgical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Park EJ, Baik SH (2016) Robotic surgery for colon and rectal cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 18(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-015-0491-8 - DOI
    1. Jordan J, Dowson H, Gage H, Jackson D, Rockall T (2014) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer and polyps: a cost-effectiveness study. Clin Outcomes Res 6:415–422. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S66247 - DOI
    1. Silva-Velazco J, Dietz DW, Stocchi L et al (2017) Considering value in rectal cancer surgery: an analysis of costs and outcomes based on the open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach for proctectomy. Ann Surg 265(5):960–968. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001815 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harr JN, Juo YY, Luka S, Agarwal S, Brody F, Obias V (2016) Incisional and port-site hernias following robotic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30(8):3505–3510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4639-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carr BM, Lyon JA, Romeiser J, Talamini M, Shroyer ALW (2019) Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a systematic review evaluating Cochrane systematic reviews. Surg Endosc 33(6):1693–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6532-2 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources