Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters
- PMID: 3352332
- DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198804000-00008
Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters
Abstract
This paper presents the results of two studies that compared methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. One form used six-point response scales ranging from "very satisfied" to "very dissatisfied" (S6 scale); the other used five-point scales ranging from "excellent" to "poor" (E5 scale). Forms were assigned randomly to outpatients in fee-for-service (N = 136) and prepaid systems of care (N = 363) and were compared in terms of response variability, reliability, and validity. In both studies, the E5 scales showed greater response variability and better predicted whether patients intended to return to the same doctor in the future, recommend the doctor to a friend, and comply with the medical regimen. Reliability was satisfactory and did not differ between methods. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for constructing visit-specific satisfaction rating scales.
Similar articles
-
The meaning of patient satisfaction with prepaid primary health care in Israel.Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):385-93. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90017-4. Eval Program Plann. 1983. PMID: 10267265
-
Measuring patient satisfaction with medical services using social media generated data.Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Mar 12;31(2):96-105. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2016-0183. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018. PMID: 29504870
-
Patient satisfaction and selected physician behaviors: does the type of practice make a difference?J Am Board Fam Pract. 1989 Apr-Jun;2(2):87-92. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1989. PMID: 2711889
-
Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters.Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):657-75. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00002. Med Care. 1988. PMID: 3292851 Review.
-
Evaluating the physician office visit: in pursuit of a valid and reliable measure of quality improvement efforts.J Ambul Care Manage. 1996 Jan;19(1):17-37. J Ambul Care Manage. 1996. PMID: 10154367 Review.
Cited by
-
A call for better care: the impact of postnatal contact services on women's parenting confidence and experiences of postpartum care in Queensland, Australia.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 20;14:635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0635-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25526987 Free PMC article.
-
Face-to-face vs telephone pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer screening; a randomised trial.Br J Cancer. 2012 Sep 25;107(7):1051-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.358. Epub 2012 Aug 23. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22918392 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The cancer outpatient satisfaction with care questionnaire for chemotherapy, OUT-PATSAT35 CT: a validation study for Spanish patients.Support Care Cancer. 2012 Dec;20(12):3269-78. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1467-y. Epub 2012 May 2. Support Care Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22549507
-
Patient satisfaction and quality of care in walk-in clinics, family practices and emergency departments: the Ontario Walk-In Clinic Study.CMAJ. 2003 Apr 15;168(8):977-83. CMAJ. 2003. PMID: 12695380 Free PMC article.
-
Patient satisfaction in resident and attending ambulatory care clinics.J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Nov;16(11):755-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.91005.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11722690 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical