Why does computation of centiles from equations for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio from Fetal Medicine Foundation study of 72 387 fetuses not agree with tabular results?
- PMID: 33524236
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.23578
Why does computation of centiles from equations for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio from Fetal Medicine Foundation study of 72 387 fetuses not agree with tabular results?
Comment in
-
Reply.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;57(2):350-351. doi: 10.1002/uog.23579. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33524235 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Fetal Medicine Foundation reference ranges for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):465-472. doi: 10.1002/uog.20157. Epub 2019 Feb 13. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30353583
References
-
- Ciobanu A, Wright A, Syngelaki A, Wright D, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Fetal Medicine Foundation reference ranges for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 465-472.
-
- DeVore GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 5-15.
-
- DeVore GR. Computing the Z Score and Centiles for Cross-sectional Analysis: A Practical Approach. J Ultrasound Med 2017; 36: 459-473.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
