Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 28;21(3):864.
doi: 10.3390/s21030864.

Unobtrusive Health Monitoring in Private Spaces: The Smart Home

Affiliations
Review

Unobtrusive Health Monitoring in Private Spaces: The Smart Home

Ju Wang et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

With the advances in sensor technology, big data, and artificial intelligence, unobtrusive in-home health monitoring has been a research focus for decades. Following up our research on smart vehicles, within the framework of unobtrusive health monitoring in private spaces, this work attempts to provide a guide to current sensor technology for unobtrusive in-home monitoring by a literature review of the state of the art and to answer, in particular, the questions: (1) What types of sensors can be used for unobtrusive in-home health data acquisition? (2) Where should the sensors be placed? (3) What data can be monitored in a smart home? (4) How can the obtained data support the monitoring functions? We conducted a retrospective literature review and summarized the state-of-the-art research on leveraging sensor technology for unobtrusive in-home health monitoring. For structured analysis, we developed a four-category terminology (location, unobtrusive sensor, data, and monitoring functions). We acquired 912 unique articles from four relevant databases (ACM Digital Lib, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and Scopus) and screened them for relevance, resulting in n=55 papers analyzed in a structured manner using the terminology. The results delivered 25 types of sensors (motion sensor, contact sensor, pressure sensor, electrical current sensor, etc.) that can be deployed within rooms, static facilities, or electric appliances in an ambient way. While behavioral data (e.g., presence (n=38), time spent on activities (n=18)) can be acquired effortlessly, physiological parameters (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate) are measurable on a limited scale (n=5). Behavioral data contribute to functional monitoring. Emergency monitoring can be built up on behavioral and environmental data. Acquired physiological parameters allow reasonable monitoring of physiological functions to a limited extent. Environmental data and behavioral data also detect safety and security abnormalities. Social interaction monitoring relies mainly on direct monitoring of tools of communication (smartphone; computer). In summary, convincing proof of a clear effect of these monitoring functions on clinical outcome with a large sample size and long-term monitoring is still lacking.

Keywords: ambient assisted living; elderly; health monitoring; patient; sensor; smart home.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Terminology of unobtrusive in-home health monitoring.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Review flowchart.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Connections between sensors and their locations. A wider connection indicates more included papers supporting the connection in this review. The terms in the same category are illustrated in the same color.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of sensor occurrences.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Distribution of smart home functions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Distribution of wireless sensor networks.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Distribution of number of patients and elderly adults.

References

    1. Deserno T.M. Transforming smart vehicles and smart homes into private diagnostic spaces; Proceedings of the 2nd Asia Pacific Information Technology Conference (APIT 2020); Bali Island, Indonesia. 17–19 January 2020; New York, NY, USA;: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. pp. 165–171.
    1. Steiner B., Elgert L., Saalfeld B., Schwartze J., Borrmann H.P., Kobelt-Pönicke A., Figlewicz A., Kasprowski D., Thiel M., Kreikebohm R., et al. Health-enabling technologies for telerehabilitation of the shoulder: A feasibility and user acceptance study. Methods Inf. Med. 2020;59(Suppl. 2):e90. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713685. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mielke C., Voss T., Haux R. Residence as a diagnostic and therapeutic area—A smart home approach. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2017;238:92–95. - PubMed
    1. Schwartze J., Prekazi A., Schrom H., Marschollek M. Substitution of assisted living services by assistive technology—Experts opinions and technical feasibility. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2017;238:116–119. - PubMed
    1. Consel C., Kaye J. Aging with the Internet of Things. Bridge. 2019;49:6–12.

LinkOut - more resources