Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 28;18(3):1154.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031154.

Residual Force Enhancement Is Present in Consecutive Post-Stretch Isometric Contractions of the Hamstrings during a Training Simulation

Affiliations

Residual Force Enhancement Is Present in Consecutive Post-Stretch Isometric Contractions of the Hamstrings during a Training Simulation

Neil D Chapman et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Residual force enhancement (rFE) is observed when isometric force following an active stretch is elevated compared to an isometric contraction at corresponding muscle lengths. Acute rFE has been confirmed in vivo in upper and lower limb muscles. However, it is uncertain whether rFE persists using multiple, consecutive contractions as per a training simulation. Using the knee flexors, 10 recreationally active participants (seven males, three females; age 31.00 years ± 8.43 years) performed baseline isometric contractions at 150° knee flexion (180° representing terminal knee extension) of 50% maximal voluntary activation of semitendinosus. Participants performed post-stretch isometric (PS-ISO) contractions (three sets of 10 repetitions) starting at 90° knee extension with a joint rotation of 60° at 60°·s-1 at 50% maximal voluntary activation of semitendinosus. Baseline isometric torque and muscle activation were compared to PS-ISO torque and muscle activation across all 30 repetitions. Significant rFE was noted in all repetitions (37.8-77.74%), with no difference in torque between repetitions or sets. There was no difference in activation of semitendinosus or biceps femoris long-head between baseline and PS-ISO contractions in all repetitions (ST; baseline ISO = 0.095-1.000 ± 0.036-0.039 Mv, PS-ISO = 0.094-0.098 ± 0.033-0.038 and BFlh; baseline ISO = 0.068-0.075 ± 0.031-0.038 Mv). This is the first investigation to observe rFE during multiple, consecutive submaximal PS-ISO contractions. PS-ISO contractions have the potential to be used as a training stimulus.

Keywords: electromyography; hamstrings; history dependence; in vivo; muscle; residual force enhancement; training simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Baseline and experimental protocols for Group 1 and Group 2. Participants were randomly allocated into each group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean baseline isometric and PS-ISO torque during 10 consecutive repetitions over three sets. * indicates a significant increase in mean torque from baseline isometric contractions to PS-ISO contractions across all repetitions and all sets (p ≤ 0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean baseline isometric and PS-ISO muscle activation (sEMGRMS) measured in millivolts (Mv) of semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris long-head (BFlh) muscles during 10 consecutive repetitions during 3 sets (i. Set 1, ii Set 2 and iii Set 3). No difference in muscle activation was observed between baseline isometric and PS-ISO contractions for all repetitions and sets of semitendinosus (p = 0.590) and biceps femoris long-head (p = 0.198). ST sEMGRMS is depicted in the left column and BFlh sEMGRMS is depicted in the right column for Set 1 (i Set 1), Set 2 (ii. Set 2) and Set 3 (iii. Set 3). Repetitions in each set are visualized on the x axis and sEMGRMS on the y axis of each graph.

Similar articles

References

    1. Green B., Bourne M.N., Van Dyk N., Pizzari T. Recalibrating the risk of hamstring strain injury (HSI): A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for index and recurrent hamstring strain injury in sport. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020;54:1081–1088. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100983. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Hooren B., Frans B. Is There Really an Eccentric Action of the Hamstrings During the Swing Phase of High-Speed Running? Part I: A Critical Review of the Literature. J. Sports Sci. 2017;35:2313–2321. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1266018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chumanov E.S., Heiderscheit B.C., Thelen D.G. Hamstring Musculotendon Dynamics during Stance and Swing Phases of High-Speed Running. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011;43:525–532. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181f23fe8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higashihara A., Nagano Y., Ono T., Fukubayashi T. Relationship between the peak time of hamstring stretch and activation during sprinting. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2016;16:36–41. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.973913. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Higashihara A., Nagano Y., Takahashi K., Fukubayashi T. Effects of forward trunk lean on hamstring muscle kinematics during sprinting. J. Sports Sci. 2014;33:1366–1375. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.990483. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources