Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;35(1):101662.
doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2021.101662. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

Managing patients using telerheumatology: Lessons from a pandemic

Affiliations
Review

Managing patients using telerheumatology: Lessons from a pandemic

James Bateman et al. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has presented unique challenges to rheumatology provision. Measures to control the pandemic have limited face-to-face contact with rheumatology healthcare professionals. One innovation has been the widespread adoption of telerheumatology to assist in the care of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, building on an existing evidence base in rheumatology. Widespread adoption has only occurred following the COVID-19 pandemic. We discuss the evidence supporting telerheumatology adoption prior to the pandemic, and outline several innovative approaches used to assist in the care of rheumatology patients that have been introduced. Alongside the advantages of these interventions, we discuss the limitations and regulatory challenges. Advances must be balanced, considering wider issues of equity of access, implementation, adoption, and sustainability of telerheumatology post-pandemic. We propose it is not 'if', but 'how' rheumatologists embrace newer telerheumatology technology, outlining practice points and future research agenda.

Keywords: COVID-19; Diagnosis; Health services accessibility; Remote consultation/methods; Rheumatic diseases/diagnosis; Rheumatic diseases/therapy; Rheumatology; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Telerheumatology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest for this publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of still images from two remote VCs identifying active disease, and outlining typical controls for the consultation (Images from authors own collection).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Duffy S., Lee T.H. In-person health care as option B. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:104–106. - PubMed
    1. WHO . World Heatlh Organisation; 1998. A health telematics policy in support of WHO’s Health-For-All strategy for global health development: report of the WHO group consultation on health telematics, 11–16 December, Geneva, 1997.
    1. Telehealth and Telemedicine https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/telehealth-telemedicine.html n.d.
    1. Hollander J.E., Carr B.G. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1679–1681. - PubMed
    1. Subramanian S., Pamplin J.C., Hravnak M., et al. Tele-critical care. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:553–561. - PubMed