Indicators of dependence and efforts to quit vaping and smoking among youth in Canada, England and the USA
- PMID: 33526441
- PMCID: PMC8325708
- DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056269
Indicators of dependence and efforts to quit vaping and smoking among youth in Canada, England and the USA
Abstract
Objective: The current study examined indicators of dependence among youth cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users in Canada, England and the USA, including changes between 2017 and 2019.
Methods: Data are from repeated cross-sectional online surveys conducted in 2017, 2018 and 2019 with national samples of youth aged 16-19 years, in Canada (n=12 018), England (n=11 362) and the USA (n=12 110). Measures included perceived addiction to cigarettes/e-cigarettes, frequency of experiencing strong urges to smoke/use an e-cigarette, plans to quit smoking/using e-cigarettes and past attempts to quit. Logistic regression models were fitted to examine differences between countries and changes over time.
Results: The proportion of ever-users who vaped frequently was significantly higher in 2019 compared with 2017 for all outcomes in each country. Between 2017 and 2019, the proportion of past 30-day vapers reporting strong urges to vape on most days or more often increased in each country (Canada: 35.3%, adjusted OR (AOR) 1.69, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.38; England: 32.8%, AOR 1.55, 1.08 to 2.23; USA: 46.1%, AOR 1.88, 1.41 to 2.50), along with perceptions of being 'a little' or 'very addicted' to e-cigarettes (Canada: 48.3%, AOR 1.99, 1.44 to 2.75; England: 40.1%, AOR 1.44, 1.03 to 2.01; USA: 53.1%, AOR 1.99, 1.50 to 2.63). Indicators of dependence among smokers were consistently greater than e-cigarette users, although differences had narrowed by 2019, particularly in Canada and the USA.
Conclusions: Prevalence of dependence symptoms among young e-cigarette users increased between 2017 and 2019, more so in Canada and the USA compared with England. Dependence symptom prevalence was lower for e-cigarettes than smoking; however, the gap has narrowed over time.
Keywords: addiction; cessation; electronic nicotine delivery devices; priority/special populations; surveillance and monitoring.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: DH has served as a paid expert witness in legal challenges against tobacco companies.
Figures
References
-
- Henningfield J, Keenan R. Nicotine delivery kinetics and abuse liability. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993;61:743–50. - PubMed
-
- Hughes JR. Dependence on and abuse of nicotine replacement medications: an update. In: Benowitz N (ed). Nicotine safety and toxicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998:147–57.
-
- Hiler MM, Breland AB, Spindle TR, et al. Electronic cigarette user plasma nicotine concentration, puff topography, heart rate, and subjective effects: influence of liquid nicotine concentration and user experience. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2017;25(5):380–92. doi: 10.1037/pha0000140. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Wagener TL, Floyd EL, Stepanov I, et al. Have combustible cigarettes met their match? The nicotine delivery profiles and harmful constituent exposures of second-generation and third-generation electronic cigarette users. Tob Control 2017;26:e23–8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053041. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous