Performance of Oropharyngeal Swab Testing Compared With Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019-United States, January 2020-February 2020
- PMID: 33527126
- PMCID: PMC7337670
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa759
Performance of Oropharyngeal Swab Testing Compared With Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019-United States, January 2020-February 2020
Abstract
Among 146 nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swab pairs collected ≤7 days after illness onset, Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR) diagnostic results were 95.2% concordant. However, NP swab cycle threshold values were lower (indicating more virus) in 66.7% of concordant-positive pairs, suggesting NP swabs may more accurately detect the amount of SARS-CoV-2.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus; nasopharyngeal; oropharyngeal; testing.
Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2020.
Figures
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim guidelines for collecting, handling, and testing clinical specimens from persons for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-specim.... Accessed 8 May 2020.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use (effective February 4, 2020). Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/rt-pcr-panel-for-det.... Accessed 8 May 2020.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
