Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of flesh flies and their evolutionary implication
- PMID: 33529628
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.188
Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of flesh flies and their evolutionary implication
Abstract
Flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) include a large and widely distributed rapid radiation within the Calyptratae. They are vital for the ecosystem, as well as economic, forensic, and evolutionary studies, because of their extremely diverse habits as larvae. Phylogenetic studies of Sarcophagidae have been reaching convergence, which leads the opportunity to elucidate the evolution of these fast-evolving insects from the perspective of mitochondrial genome. Complete mitochondrial genomes of eight species were sequenced, and comparative mitochondrial genomic analysis between subfamilies were conducted. Mitochondrial genomes of these flesh flies are conserved in gene content with gene arrangement, same as the inferred ancestral insect, and the nucleotide composition is highly biased towards A + T like other flesh flies. The evolutionary rates of Sarcophagidae vary considerably across subfamilies, with that of Miltogramminae higher than the other two subfamilies. Phylogenetic analysis strongly supports monophyly of Sarcophagidae and each subfamily, with subfamily-level relationship inferred as (Sarcophaginae, (Miltogramminae, Paramacronychiinae)). The main topological inconsistency of all reconstructions is the relationship within Miltogramminae and Sarcophaga, which might be caused by their rapid evolution. Our study indicates that the mitochondrial genomes of flesh flies are highly conserved, and they are practically useful for phylogenetic inference of calyptrates.
Keywords: Evolution; Mitochondrial genome; Sarcophagidae.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources