An ethics framework for consolidating and prioritizing COVID-19 clinical trials
- PMID: 33530721
- PMCID: PMC8009845
- DOI: 10.1177/1740774520988669
An ethics framework for consolidating and prioritizing COVID-19 clinical trials
Abstract
Given the dearth of established safe and effective interventions to respond to COVID-19, there is an urgent ethical imperative to conduct meaningful clinical research. The good news is that interventions to be tested are not in short supply. Unfortunately, the human and material resources needed to conduct these trials are finite. It is essential that trials be robust and meet enrollment targets and that lower-quality studies not be permitted to displace higher-quality studies, delaying answers to critical questions. Yet, with few exceptions, existing research review bodies and processes are not designed to ensure these conditions are satisfied. To meet this challenge, we offer guidance for research institutions about how to ethically consolidate and prioritize COVID-19 clinical trials, while recognizing that consolidation and prioritization should also take place upstream (among manufacturers and funders) and at a higher level (e.g. nationally). In our proposed three-stage process, trials must first meet threshold criteria. Those that do are evaluated in a second stage to determine whether the institution has sufficient capacity to support all proposed trials. If it does not, the third stage entails evaluating studies against two additional sets of comparative prioritization criteria: those specific to the study and those that aim to advance diversification of an institution's research portfolio. To implement these criteria fairly, we propose that research institutions form COVID-19 research prioritization committees. We briefly discuss some important attributes of these committees, drawing on the authors' experiences at our respective institutions. Although we focus on clinical trials of COVID-19 therapeutics, our guidance should prove useful for other kinds of COVID-19 research, as well as non-pandemic research, which can raise similar challenges due to the scarcity of research resources.
Keywords: COVID-19; clinical trials; coronavirus; prioritization; research ethics; triage.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: S.J. reports grants from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. J.S. reports personal fees and non-financial support from Merck KGaA (Bioethics Advisory Panel and Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee), personal fees and non-financial support from IQVIA (Ethics Advisory Panel), personal fees and other from Aspen Neurosciences Inc (Scientific Advisory Board), personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc., outside the submitted work.
Figures
Comment in
-
Commentary on Meyers et al: Ethically prioritizing trials in the COVID-19 era - practical considerations.Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;18(2):234-236. doi: 10.1177/1740774520988663. Epub 2021 Feb 2. Clin Trials. 2021. PMID: 33530735 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12721281
-
Ethical issues and the role of the ethics committees during COVID-19 research in pandemic era: a focus on an Italian ethics committee.Front Public Health. 2025 May 26;13:1537863. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1537863. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40491996 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical guidelines for deliberately infecting volunteers with COVID-19.J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):502-504. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106322. Epub 2020 May 27. J Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32461245 Free PMC article.
-
Bioethical Concerns During the COVID-19 Pandemic: What Did Healthcare Ethics Committees and Institutions State in Spain?Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;9:737755. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.737755. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34722445 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical Challenges in COVID-19 Biospecimen Research: Perspectives From Institutional Review Board Members and Bioethicists.Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Jan;96(1):165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.10.021. Epub 2020 Oct 23. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021. PMID: 33413815 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Enhancing social value considerations in prioritising publicly funded biomedical research: the vital role of peer review.J Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 20;50(4):253-257. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108883. J Med Ethics. 2024. PMID: 37225413 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325. Online ahead of print. Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325. Online ahead of print. PMID: 40717555
-
Allocation of Opportunities to Participate in Clinical Trials during the Covid-19 Pandemic and Other Public Health Emergencies.Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Jan;52(1):51-58. doi: 10.1002/hast.1297. Epub 2021 Dec 15. Hastings Cent Rep. 2022. PMID: 34908169 Free PMC article.
-
Health science research barriers and facilitators in the midst of the COVID-19 crisis: scoping review.Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021 Dec 30;72(4):377-395. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3788. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021. PMID: 35134285 Free PMC article. English, Spanish.
-
Ethical, regulatory, and practical barriers to COVID-19 research: A stakeholder-informed inventory of concerns.PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265252. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35324933 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bauchner H and Fontanarosa PB. Randomized clinical trials and COVID-19: Managing expectations. JAMA 2020; 323(22): 2262–2263. - PubMed
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. COVID-19: developing drugs and biological products for treatment or prevention: guidance for industry. May 2020. https://www.fda.gov/media/137926/download (2020, accessed 20 November 2020).
-
- Dunn A There are already 72 drugs in human trials for coronavirus in the US. With hundreds more on the way, a top drug regulator warns we could run out of researchers to test them all. Business Insider, 24 April 2020, https://www.businessinsider.in/science/news/there-are-already-72-drugs-i... (2020, accessed 20 November 2020).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical