Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 2;11(1):2776.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82428-5.

Time course of the sensitivity and specificity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies for symptomatic COVID-19 in Japan

Affiliations

Time course of the sensitivity and specificity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies for symptomatic COVID-19 in Japan

Yuki Nakano et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The accurate and prompt diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is required for the control and treatment of the coronavirus infection disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we aimed to investigate the time courses of the anti-severe acute corona respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgM and IgG titers and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of such tests according to the specific day after the onset of COVID-19 among a patient population in Japan. We measured the titers of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG in sera from 105 subjects, including 26 symptomatic COVID-19 patients, using chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) methods utilizing magnetic beads coated with SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and spike protein. The results of a ROC analysis suggested the possibility that the cutoff values in Japan might be lower than the manufacturer's reported cutoff (10 AU/mL): 1 AU/mL for IgM and 5 AU/mL for IgG. The sensitivity of the test before Day 8 after symptom onset was less than 50%; at Days 9-10, however, we obtained a much higher sensitivity of 81.8% for both IgM and IgG. At 15 days or later after symptom onset, the SARS-CoV-2 IgG test had a sensitivity of 100%. These results suggest that if the number of days since disease onset is taken into consideration, these antibody tests could be very useful for the diagnosis of COVID-19 and similar diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The present study is a collaborative research project among The University of Tokyo, Shenzhen YHLO Biotech Co., Ltd, and Medical & Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd. F. X. and F. H. are employees of Shenzhen YHLO Biotech Co., Ltd and Y. K. and J. O. are employees of Medical & Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd. Y.N., M. K., Y. M., T.S., R.Y., C.Q., N.Y., Y.N., H.O., K.M., Y.S., T.K., and Y.Y. declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The time courses of serum titers of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in COVID-19 patients after symptom onset. We measured the titers of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and SARS-CoV-2 IgG in 125 sera collected from RT-PCR-positive patients (n = 26) and 68 sera collected from RT-PCR-negative patients (n = 35). The data are plotted for days 1–2, 3–4, 5–6, 7–8, 9–10, 11–12, 13–14, 15–16, 17–18, 19–20, and ≥ 21 since symptom onset. The bars show the median titers at each timepoint. The broken line shows the manufacturer’s cutoff value (10 AU/mL). (A) RT-PCR-positive patients, IgM. (B) RT-PCR-positive patients, IgG. (C) RT-PCR-negative patients, IgM. (D) RT-PCR-negative patients, IgG.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves for SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests. We compared the discriminating abilities of the SARS-CoV-2 IgM and SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers at different time points after symptom onset. The cutoff value for both tests was set at 10 AU/mL. (A) SARS-CoV-2 IgM, (B) SARS-CoV-2 IgG.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic abilities of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests according to cutoff values and time courses. We compared the sensitivities and specificities for the serum diagnosis of COVID-19 each cut off value (1–10 AU/mL) at 9–10 days after symptom onset (A: SARS-CoV-2 IgM, B: SARS-CoV-2 IgG) and investigated the time course of the diagnostic ability when the cut off values were set as 1, 2, 5 and 10 AU/mL (C: 10 AU/mL, D: 5 AU/mL, E: 2 AU/mL, F: 1 AU/mL).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of the specificity against “RT-PCR-negative group” with that against “Before COVID-19 group”. We compared the specificity against “RT-PCR-negative group” (n = 79) with that against “Before COVID-19 group” (n = 100), which contains healthy subjects in 2017. (A) SARS-CoV-2 IgM, (B) SARS-CoV-2 IgG.

References

    1. Pascarella G, et al. COVID-19 diagnosis and management: a comprehensive review. J. Intern. Med. 2020 doi: 10.1111/joim.13091. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang W, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pasomsub E, et al. Saliva sample as a non-invasive specimen for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao J, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa344. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qu J, et al. Profile of IgG and IgM antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa489. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types