Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 1;99(2):skab034.
doi: 10.1093/jas/skab034.

Effects of different defatted rice bran sources and processing technologies on nutrient digestibility in cannulated growing pigs

Bingbing B Huang  1 , Zhiqiang Q Sun  1 , Li Wang  1 , Lu Wang  1 , Huangwei W Shi  1 , Qile L Hu  1 , Zhiqian Q Lyu  1 , Defa F Li  1 , Jianjun J Zang  1 , Changhua H Lai  1
Affiliations

Effects of different defatted rice bran sources and processing technologies on nutrient digestibility in cannulated growing pigs

Bingbing B Huang et al. J Anim Sci. .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different defatted rice bran (DFRB) sources and processing technologies on nutrient digestibility in different intestinal segments of pigs. Nine barrows with T-cannula in the distal ileum were randomly allotted to nine different sources in which oil was pressed extracted for seven sources and was solvent extracted for two sources. The experiment contained 6 periods of 12 d, including 8 d for diet adaptation, 2 d for fecal collection, and 2 d for digesta collection. The apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of dry matter (DM), ash, total dietary fiber (TDF), insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and hemicellulose in different sources of DFRB was quite variable. There were no differences in the AID of dietary gross energy (GE), organic matter (OM), ether extract (EE), crude protein (CP), and soluble dietary fiber (SDF) between different sources of DFRB. There were no differences in the AID of dietary EE, TDF, IDF, and hemicellulose between different processing technologies. Pressed DFRBs have greater (P < 0.05) average AID of dietary GE, DM, ash, OM, CP, SDF, and NDF and lower (P < 0.01) ADF compared with solvent-extracted DFRBs. The apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of most of the dietary nutrients, except for the ATTD of dietary EE, SDF, and hemicellulose, significantly varied in different sources of DFRB (P < 0.05). In addition, pressed DFRB had greater (P < 0.05) ATTD of dietary SDF, NDF, ADF, and hemicellulose compared with solvent-extracted DFRB. The apparent hindgut digestibility (AHD) of dietary DM, SDF, NDF, and ADF significantly varied (P <0.05) in different sources of DFRB. Exception with DM, there are no differences in the AHD of nutrients digestibility between pressed DFRB and solvent-extracted DFRB. In conclusion, DFRB in different sources and processing technologies with different physicochemical properties had different effects on nutrient digestibility in the foregut and hindgut of pigs.

Keywords: defatted rice bran; digestibility; fiber; hindgut disappearance; pig; process.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. AOAC . 2006. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Arlington (VA): AOAC International.
    1. American Association of Cereal Chemists. 1976. Approved methods of analysis. St. Paul (MN): American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc.
    1. Asaoka, M., Okuno K., and Fuwa H.. . 1985. Effect of environmental temperature at the milky stage on amylose content and fine structure of amylopectin of waxy and nonwaxy endosperm starches of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agric. Biol. Chem. 49:373–379. doi:10.1080/00021369.1985.10866741 - DOI
    1. Bach Knudsen, K. E., Hedemann M. S., and Laerke H. N.. . 2012. The role of carbohydrates in intestinal health of pigs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 173:41–53. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.020 - DOI
    1. Bell, J. M. 1993. Factors affecting the nutritional-value of canola meal: a review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 73:689–697. doi:10.4141/cjas93-075 - DOI