Determinants of cerebral blood flow velocity change during squat-stand maneuvers
- PMID: 33533312
- DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00291.2020
Determinants of cerebral blood flow velocity change during squat-stand maneuvers
Abstract
The large changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) induced by squat-stand maneuvers (SSM) make this approach particularly suited for studying dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA). However, the role of other systemic determinants of CBFV has not been described and could provide alternative physiological interpretations of SSM results. In 32 healthy subjects (16 female), continuous recordings of MABP (Finometer), bilateral CBFV (transcranial Doppler, MCA), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2; capnography), and heart rate (HR; electrocardiogram) were performed for 5 min standing at rest, and during 15 SSM at the frequency of 0.05 Hz. A time-domain, multivariate dynamic model estimated the CBFV variance explained by different inputs, corresponding to significant contributions from MABP (P < 0.00001), EtCO2 (P < 0.0001), and HR (P = 0.041). The autoregulation index (ARI; range 0-9) was estimated from the CBFV response to a step change in MABP. At rest, ARI values (typically 5.7) were independent of the number of model inputs, but during SSM, ARI was reduced compared with baseline (P < 0.0001), and the three input model yielded lower values for the right and left MCA (3.4 ± 1.2, 3.1 ± 1.3) when compared with the single-input MABP-CBFV model (4.1 ± 1.1, 3.9 ± 1.0; P < 0.0001). The high coherence of the MABP-CBFV transfer function at 0.05 Hz (typically 0.98) was considerably reduced (around 0.71-0.73; P < 0.0001) when the contribution of CBFV covariates was taken into account. Not taking into consideration other determinants of CBFV, in addition to MABP, could be misleading and introduce biases in physiological and clinical studies.
Keywords: arterial blood pressure; cerebral autoregulation; cerebral blood flow; end-tidal CO2; heart rate.
Similar articles
-
Directional sensitivity of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in squat-stand maneuvers.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018 Oct 1;315(4):R730-R740. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00010.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 5. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018. PMID: 29975567
-
Alternative representation of neural activation in multivariate models of neurovascular coupling in humans.J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):833-843. doi: 10.1152/jn.00175.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 26. J Neurophysiol. 2019. PMID: 31242062
-
The critical closing pressure contribution to dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: influence of arterial partial pressure of CO2.J Physiol. 2020 Dec;598(24):5673-5685. doi: 10.1113/JP280439. Epub 2020 Oct 6. J Physiol. 2020. PMID: 32975820
-
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during repeated handgrip exercise: comparisons with spontaneous rest and sit-stand maneuvers.J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Sep 1;137(3):718-727. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00217.2024. Epub 2024 Aug 8. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024. PMID: 39116347
-
Postural effects on cerebral blood flow and autoregulation.Physiol Rep. 2017 Feb;5(4):e13150. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13150. Epub 2017 Feb 27. Physiol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28242827 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Validity and reliability of deriving the autoregulatory plateau through projection pursuit regression from driven methods.Physiol Rep. 2024 Jan;12(2):e15919. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15919. Physiol Rep. 2024. PMID: 38262711 Free PMC article.
-
Force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit-to-stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation.Physiol Rep. 2023 Jun;11(11):e15750. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15750. Physiol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37308311 Free PMC article.
-
Time-domain methods for quantifying dynamic cerebral blood flow autoregulation: Review and recommendations. A white paper from the Cerebrovascular Research Network (CARNet).J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024 Sep;44(9):1480-1514. doi: 10.1177/0271678X241249276. Epub 2024 Apr 30. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024. PMID: 38688529 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Point/counterpoint: We should not take the direction of blood pressure change into consideration for dynamic cerebral autoregulation quantification.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2022 Dec;42(12):2354-2356. doi: 10.1177/0271678X221123442. Epub 2022 Sep 13. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2022. PMID: 36113047 Free PMC article.
-
Novel application of a force sensor during sit-to-stands to measure dynamic cerebral autoregulation onset.Physiol Rep. 2022 Apr;10(7):e15244. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15244. Physiol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35384357 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical