Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;84(6):407-418.
doi: 10.1111/cod.13803. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I-positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents

Johannes Geier  1 , Steffen Schubert  1 , Axel Schnuch  1 , Christiane Szliska  2 , Elke Weisshaar  3 , Birger Kränke  4 , Thomas Werfel  5 , Franziska Ruëff  6 , Claudia Schröder-Kraft  7 , Timo Buhl  8 ; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology
Collaborators, Affiliations

A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I-positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents

Johannes Geier et al. Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false-positive, or the breakdown test is false-negative.

Objectives: To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents.

Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790).

Results: Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non-fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I.

Conclusions: Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false-positive. There may be false-negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.

Keywords: amyl cinnamal; breakdown test; clinical epidemiology; eugenol; fragrance allergy; fragrance mix I; geraniol; patch test concentration; patch testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Rustemeyer T, van Hoogstraten IMW, von Blomberg BME, Gibbs S, Scheper RJ. Mechanisms of irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J-P, eds. Contact Dermatitis. 5th ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011:43-90.
    1. Larsen WG. Perfume dermatitis. A study of 20 patients. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(5):623-626.
    1. Storrs FJ. Fragrance. Dermatitis. 2007;18(1):3-7.
    1. Wöhrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Götz M, Jarisch R. The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145(2):268-273.
    1. Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J. Patch testing with fragrance mix at 16% and 8%, and its individual constituents. Contact Dermatitis. 1989;20(3):237-238.

LinkOut - more resources