Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 13;117(46):775-782.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0775.

Long-Term Survival Following Sepsis

Affiliations

Long-Term Survival Following Sepsis

Konrad Schmidt et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. .

Abstract

Background: There have not yet been any prospective registry studies in Germany with active investigation of the long-term survival of patients with sepsis.

Methods: The Jena Sepsis Registry (JSR) included all patients with a diagnosis of sepsis in the four intensive care units of Jena University Hospital from January 2011 to December 2015. Long-term survival 6-48 months after diagnosis was documented by asking the treating general practitioners. The survival times were studied with Kaplan-Meier estimators. Cox regressions were calculated to show associations between possible predictors and survival time.

Results: 1975 patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. The mean time of observation was 730 days. For 96.4% of the queries to the general practitioners, information on long-term survival was available. Mortality in the intensive care unit was 34% (95% confidence interval [32; 37]), and in-hospital mortality was 45% [42; 47]. The overall mortality six months after diagnosis was 59% [57; 62], the overall mortality 48 months after diagnosis was 74% [72; 78]. Predictors of shorter survival were age, nosocomial origin of sepsis, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, and renal replacement therapy.

Conclusion: The nearly 75% mortality four years after diagnosis indicates that changes are needed both in the acute treatment of patients with sepsis and in their multi-sector long-term care. The applicability of these findings may be limited by their having been obtained in a single center.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Long-term survival of 1975 patients with (severe) sepsis and septic shock treated in intensive care. Kaplan–Meier estimators for the total sample (A) and stratified by sex (B), age (C), and APACHE II score (D) (tertiles in each case) are shown.

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101:1644–1655. - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mikolajetz A, Schwarzkopf D, et al. Challenges in assessing the burden of sepsis and understanding the inequalities of sepsis outcomes between national health systems: secular trends in sepsis and infection incidence and mortality in Germany. Intens Care Med. 2018;44:1826–1835. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis Current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:259–272. - PubMed
    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395:200–211. - PMC - PubMed