Perceptions of Deep Brain Stimulation for Adolescents with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- PMID: 33534637
- PMCID: PMC7984933
- DOI: 10.1089/cap.2020.0166
Perceptions of Deep Brain Stimulation for Adolescents with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Abstract
Objective: The present study aims to understand perceptions of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in adolescents among two groups: parents of children with a history of OCD and adults with a history of OCD. Methods: Two hundred sixty participants completed a questionnaire exploring their treatment history, relevant symptom severity, DBS knowledge, and DBS attitudes using an acceptability scale and a series of statements indicating levels of willingness or reluctance to consider DBS for adolescents with severe OCD or severe epilepsy. Results: Overall, participants found DBS to be fairly acceptable for adolescents with severe OCD, with 63% reporting at least 7/10 on a 0-10 acceptability Likert scale. Respondents were more willing to consider DBS for epilepsy than for OCD. Several factors were associated with greater willingness to consider DBS for OCD, including familiarity with DBS, the presence of suicidal thoughts, assurances of daily functioning improvements, and assurances of substantial symptom reduction. Concerns about safety, personality changes, and long-term effects on the body were associated with greatest reluctance to consider DBS for OCD. Conclusions: Our findings support the importance of increasing parents' familiarity with DBS, monitoring factors participants identified as most important to their DBS perceptions in future DBS research, and communicating benefits and risks clearly. We also highlight the need for further research on perceptions of DBS for severe and refractory OCD in adolescents.
Keywords: DBS; adolescents; deep brain stimulation; epilepsy; neuroethics; obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Storch receives research support from the NIH, International OCD Foundation, Greater Houston Community Foundation, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, and the Misophonia Research Fund. He has received royalties from Elsevier Publications, Springer Publications, American Psychological Association, Wiley, Inc., and Lawrence Erlbaum. Dr. Storch is on the Speaker's Bureau and Scientific Advisory Board for the International OCD Foundation. Dr. Schneider received grant funding from the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, the American Red Cross, and the Misophonia Research Fund. Dr. Sheth is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Koh Young, Theracle, and Zimmer. All other authors report no financial disclosures. We report no other potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Alonso P, Cuadras D, Gabriëls L, Denys D, Goodman W, Greenberg BD, Jimenez-Ponce F, Kuhn J, Lenartz D, Mallet L, Nuttin B, Real E, Segalas C, Schuurman R, du Montcel ST, Menchon JM: Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of treatment outcome and predictors of response. PLoS One 10:e0133591, 2015 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Barzilay R, Patrick A, Calkins ME, Moore TM, Wolf DH, Benton TD, Leckman JF, Gur RC, Gur RE: Obsessive-compulsive symptomatology in community youth: Typical development or a red flag for psychopathology? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 58:277–286.e4, 2019 - PubMed
-
- Cif L, Coubes P: Historical developments in children's deep brain stimulation. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 21:109–117, 2017 - PubMed
-
- Clausen J: Ethical brain stimulation—Neuroethics of deep brain stimulation in research and clinical practice. Eur J Neurosci 32:1152–1162, 2010 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical