Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;15(3):463-468.
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721905. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

Clinical Performance of Two Types of Primary Molar Indirect Crowns Fabricated by 3D Printer and CAD/CAM for Rehabilitation of Large Carious Primary Molars

Mohammed Nour Al-Halabi  1 , Nada Bshara  1 , Jihad Abou Nassar  2 , John C Comisi  3 , Charline K Rizk  4
Affiliations

Clinical Performance of Two Types of Primary Molar Indirect Crowns Fabricated by 3D Printer and CAD/CAM for Rehabilitation of Large Carious Primary Molars

Mohammed Nour Al-Halabi et al. Eur J Dent. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of two types of esthetic crowns fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) dental printer and computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system as an alternative full-coronal restoration for extensively carious pulp-treated primary molars.

Materials and methods: Randomization was done for 50 lower primary molars in 50 child patients, split into two groups based on the fabrication method used: Group A: CAD/CAM crowns using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) blocks and Group B: 3D dental printed crowns using GC photopolymer resin. All crowns were evaluated at baseline and at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months using the U.S. Public Health Service criteria for gingival health, retention, and marginal integrity for both groups.

Statistical analysis: The survival rate of 3D-printable crowns was 84% compared with 80% survival rate using CAD/CAM fabricated crowns at the end of the 12th-month follow-up. No statistically significant differences were noted in restoration failure. In the evaluation of gingival health between the two groups' follow-up times, no statistically significant differences were noted at the 3rd- and 6th-month follow-ups, yet at the 12th month, statistically significant differences were noted (p = 0.022) when comparing gingival health. No statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups when comparing marginal integrity scores in all the follow-up periods.

Conclusion: Resin crowns fabricated via 3D dental printer and PMMA crowns fabricated using CAD/CAM are acceptable esthetic choices in restoring pulp-treated primary molars with great marginal integrity and crowns retention. 3D-printed resin crowns showed less cementing failure and performed better regarding gingival response compared with PMMA crowns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the lead authors’ University (IRB Approval #1191), and the trial was registered in the ANZCTR clinical registry (trial ID: ACTRN12619001650189).All the authors took part in conducting the study, manuscript preparation, and editing.None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram for the trial. PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate; USPHS, U.S. Public Health Service.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
( A, B ) Polymethyl methacrylate crowns fabricated using CAD/CAM after 12th-month follow-up. CAD/CAM, computer-aided design and manufacturing.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
( A, B ) Photopolymer resin crowns fabricated using three-dimensional dental printer after 12th-month follow-up.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Crowns retention for both groups for all follow-up times. CAD/CAM, computer-aided design and manufacturing.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. British Society of Paediatric Dentistry . Kindelan S A, Day P, Nichol R, Willmott N, Fayle S A. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18 01:20–28. - PubMed
    1. Bell S J, Morgan A G, Marshman Z, Rodd H D. Child and parental acceptance of preformed metal crowns. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010;11(05):218–224. - PubMed
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, 2000. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services
    1. Roberts J F. The open-face stainless steel crown for primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child. 1983;50(04):262–263. - PubMed
    1. Ram D, Fuks A B, Eidelman E. Long-term clinical performance of esthetic primary molar crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(06):582–584. - PubMed