Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;34(1):5-14.
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714245. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

Metrics Used to Quantify Fecal Incontinence and Constipation

Affiliations
Review

Metrics Used to Quantify Fecal Incontinence and Constipation

Cameron W Hunt et al. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

While fecal incontinence and constipation can be measured through physiological testing, the subjective experience of severity and impact on health-related quality of life lead to both being most effectively captured through patient-reported measures. Patient-reported measures of severity and impact help to determine baseline symptoms, guide clinical decision making, and compare various treatments. Here, we take pause to review the psychometric qualities that make effective instruments, and discuss some of the most commonly used instruments along with the reasons behind their use. In addition, we highlight the benefits of a standardized instrument designed to evaluate the major symptoms of patients presenting with pelvic floor disorders (including fecal incontinence and constipation). Ultimately, we aim to provide guidance in choosing appropriate instruments for clinical and research use.

Keywords: constipation metrics; fecal incontinence metrics; patient-reported outcomes; severity measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
IMPACT (Initial Measurement of Patient-Reported Pelvic Floor Complaints Tool) bowel function, short form. (Reprinted with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.: Bordeianou LG, Anger JT, Boutros M, et al. Measuring Pelvic Floor Disorder Symptoms Using Patient-Reported Instruments: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, and the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 2020;63(1):15–17 ( https://journals.lww.com/dcrjournal ).)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McLeod L D, Coon C D, Martin S A, Fehnel S E, Hays R D. Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(02):163–169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006479. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baxter N N, Rothenberger D A, Lowry A C. Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(12):1591–1605. - PubMed
    1. Karoui S, Savoye-Collet C, Koning E, Leroi A M, Denis P. Prevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed by sonography in 335 incontinent patients and 115 continent patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(02):389–392. - PubMed
    1. Rasmussen O O, Sørensen M, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J. Dynamic anal manometry in the assessment of patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(10):901–907. - PubMed