Clinical results and survivorship of the Mathys Affinis Short, Short Stem Total Shoulder Prosthesis
- PMID: 33537677
- PMCID: PMC7842163
- DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.21.BJO-2020-0184
Clinical results and survivorship of the Mathys Affinis Short, Short Stem Total Shoulder Prosthesis
Abstract
Aims: The Mathys Affinis Short is the most frequently used stemless total shoulder prosthesis in the UK. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to report the survivorship, clinical, and radiological outcomes of the first independent series of the Affinis Short prosthesis.
Methods: From January 2011 to January 2019, a total of 141 Affinis Short prostheses were implanted in 127 patients by a single surgeon. Mean age at time of surgery was 68 (44 to 89). Minimum one year and maximum eight year follow-up (mean 3.7 years) was analyzed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at latest follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with implant revision as the endpoint. Most recently performed radiographs were reviewed for component radiolucent lines (RLLs) and proximal humeral migration.
Results: Five shoulders underwent revision surgery (3.5%); three for rotator cuff failure, one for infection, and one for component malposition. Survivorship of the implant was 95.4% (95% confidence interval 90.1% to 97.9%) at five and nine years. Mean OSS improved significantly compared to preoperative values from 19.0 (1 to 35) to 43.3 (7 to 48) (p < 0.001). Radiological analysis was undertaken for 99 shoulders. This revealed humeral RLLs in one case (1%), glenoid RLLs in 15 cases (15.2%), and radiological rotator cuff failure in 22 cases (22.2%).
Conclusion: This prospective cohort study shows encouraging short- to mid-term survivorship and clinical and radiological results for the Mathys Affinis Short, Short Stem Total Shoulder Prosthesis.Level of Evidence: IVCite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):58-65.
Keywords: Affinis; Outcomes; Short stem humeral prosthesis; Shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder replacement; Stemless.
© 2021 Author(s) et al.
Figures
References
-
- Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M, Gartsman GM, Guyatt G, Kirkley A. A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87-A(9):1947–1956. - PubMed
-
- IK L, Litchfield RB, Griffin S, Faber K, Patterson SD, Kirkley A. Quality-Of-Life outcome following hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2005;87-A(10):2178–2185. - PubMed
-
- Liu EY, Kord D, Horner NS, Leroux T, Alolabi B, Khan M. Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(9):1928–1937. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
