Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 1;29(11):e523-e535.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00558.

Principles of Locking Plate Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures

Affiliations
Review

Principles of Locking Plate Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures

Reza Omid et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. .

Abstract

Proximal humerus fractures are common, particularly in elderly patients and those with osteopenia or osteoporosis. Although nonsurgical management results in satisfactory outcomes for most patients, surgical treatment is indicated in select cases. Despite an increasing trend toward arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures can still provide excellent clinical outcomes. Proper technique for internal fixation of the proximal humerus requires an understanding of osseous and neurovascular anatomy. In particular, understanding reliable regions of biomechanically superior bone can help prevent failure of fixation. Biomechanical studies have shown that locked plating of proximal humerus fractures provides stable fixation. Cadaveric and finite element models underscore the importance of screw placement in the posteromedial metaphysis. When medial column support is challenging to obtain, or when bone quality is poor, augmentation with bone autograft, allograft, and/or synthetic composites can improve the biomechanics of internal fixation constructs. The purpose of this review is to outline the anatomic, biologic, and biomechanical principles of plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing fixation and preventing fixation failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. McLean AS, Price N, Graves S, Hatton A, Taylor FJ: Nationwide trends in management of proximal humeral fractures: An analysis of 77,966 cases from 2008 to 2017. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:2072-2078.
    1. Majed A, Thangarajah T, Southgate D, Reilly P, Bull A, Emery R: Cortical thickness analysis of the proximal humerus. Shoulder Elbow 2019;11:87-93.
    1. Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M: Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004;13:427-433.
    1. Hettrich CM, Boraiah S, Dyke JP, Neviaser A, Helfet DL, Lorich DG: Quantitative assessment of the vascularity of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:943-948.
    1. Brooks CH, Revell WJ, Heatley FW: Vascularity of the humeral head after proximal humeral fractures. An anatomical cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:132-136.