Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;1(2):e29.
doi: 10.1002/cpz1.29.

Native Isolation of 3×HA-Tagged Protein Complexes to Characterize Protein-Protein Interactions

Affiliations

Native Isolation of 3×HA-Tagged Protein Complexes to Characterize Protein-Protein Interactions

JiaWen Lim et al. Curr Protoc. 2021 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) is a straightforward method that is widely used in studying direct protein-protein interactions in physiological environments. This technique is based on the antigen-antibody interaction: the protein of interest (bait) is captured by a specific antibody, followed by antibody-bait precipitation. The proteins interacting with the bait protein (prey) co-precipitate with the antibody-bait complex from a cell lysate as an antibody-bait/prey complex. Nowadays, a variety of surface-functionalized materials with antibodies immobilized on agarose or magnetic beads are available, replacing the precipitation of antibodies and simplifying the application. However, unspecific binding of cellular proteins to matrix surfaces and/or antibodies has become a common issue. Unspecific binding that leads to false-positive signals and a high background can hamper further analysis. Our protocol describes a strategy to tremendously reduce unspecific background when isolating native proteins and protein complexes. Instead of eluting our samples under denaturing conditions, we elute triple hemagglutinin (3×HA)-tagged bait/prey complexes in their native form with a competitive peptide simulating the 3×HA tag of the bait protein. Matrix-unspecific interacting proteins and Co-IP antibodies remain on the matrix instead of being eluted under conventionally applied denaturing conditions. We optimized the elution by altering incubation time, eluent concentration, and temperature. These improvements result in more pure proteins. This strategy not only reduces background in SDS-PAGE and western blot but also allows complex characterization in vitro. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords: co-immunoprecipitation; native elution; native protein complexes; protein interaction; pull down.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Literature Cited

References
    1. Brizzard, B., & Chubet, R. (1997). Epitope tagging of recombinant proteins. Current Protocols in Neuroscience, 00(1), 5.8.1-5.8.10. doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0508s00.
    1. Gallagher, S., & Sasse, J. (2001). Protein analysis by SDS-PAGE and detection by Coomassie blue or silver staining. Current Protocols in Pharmacology, 2, A.3B.1-A.3B.10. doi: 10.1002/0471141755.pha03bs02.
    1. Gallagher, S., Winston, S. E., Fuller, S. A., & Hurrell, J. G. R. (2008). Immunoblotting and immunodetection. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 83, 10.8.1-10.8.28. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1008s83.
    1. Hernan, R., Heuermann, K., & Brizzard, B. (2000). Multiple epitope tagging of expressed proteins for enhanced detection. BioTechniques, 28(4), 789-793. doi: 10.2144/00284pf01.
    1. Kaboord, B., & Perr, M. (2008). Isolation of proteins and protein complexes by immunoprecipitation. Methods in Molecular Biology, 424, 349-364. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-064-9_27.
Key References
    1. Free, R. B., Hazelwood, L. A., & Sibley, D. R. (2009). Identifying novel protein-protein interactions using co-immunoprecipitation and mass spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Neuroscience, 46(1), 139-148. doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0528s46.
    1. LaCava, J., Molloy, K. R., Taylor, M. S., Domanski, M., Chait, B. T., & Rout, M. P. (2015). Affinity proteomics to study endogenous protein complexes: Pointers, pitfalls, preferences and perspectives. BioTechniques, 58(3), 103-119. doi: 10.2144/000114262.

LinkOut - more resources