A Pooled Toxicity Analysis of Moderately Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Prostate Cancer Patients
- PMID: 33539968
- PMCID: PMC9610030
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.043
A Pooled Toxicity Analysis of Moderately Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Prostate Cancer Patients
Abstract
Purpose: Data comparing moderately hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) are lacking. We aim to compare late toxicity profiles of patients with early-stage prostate cancer treated with moderately hypofractionated PBT and IMRT.
Methods and materials: This multi-institutional analysis included patients with low- or intermediate-risk biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma from 7 tertiary referral centers treated from 1998 to 2018. All patients were treated with moderately hypofractionated radiation, defined as 250 to 300 cGy per daily fraction given for 4 to 6 weeks, and stratified by use of IMRT or PBT. Primary outcomes were late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Adjusted toxicity rates were calculated using inverse probability of treatment weighting, accounting for race, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group, age, pretreatment International Prostate Symptom Score (GU only), and anticoagulant use (GI only).
Results: A total of 1850 patients were included: 1282 IMRT (median follow-up 80.0 months) and 568 PBT (median follow-up 43.9 months). Overall toxicity rates were low, with the majority of patients experiencing no late GU (56.6%, n = 1048) or late GI (74.4%, n = 1377) toxicity. No difference was seen in the rates of late toxicity between the groups, with late grade 3+ GU toxicity of 2.0% versus 3.9% (odds ratio [OR] 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.17-1.28) and late grade 2+ GI toxicity of 14.6% versus 4.7% (OR 2.69; confidence interval 0.80-9.05) for the PBT and IMRT cohorts, respectively. On multivariable analysis, no factors were significantly predictive of GU toxicity, and only anticoagulant use was significantly predictive of GI toxicity (OR 1.90; P = .008).
Conclusions: In this large, multi-institutional analysis of 1850 patients with early-stage prostate cancer, treatment with moderately hypofractionated IMRT and PBT resulted in low rates of toxicity. No difference was seen in late GI and GU toxicity between the modalities during long-term follow-up. Both treatments are safe and well tolerated.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A pooled patient-reported outcomes analysis of moderately hypofractionated proton beam therapy and photon-based intensity modulated radiation therapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Prostate. 2024 Mar;84(4):395-402. doi: 10.1002/pros.24660. Epub 2023 Dec 18. Prostate. 2024. PMID: 38108113 Free PMC article.
-
A case-matched study of toxicity outcomes after proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;121(7):1118-27. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29148. Epub 2014 Nov 25. Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25423899 Free PMC article.
-
Ten-Year Outcomes of Moderately Hypofractionated (70 Gy in 28 fractions) Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jun 1;104(2):325-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.091. Epub 2019 Feb 2. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019. PMID: 30721720
-
Genitourinary toxicity in patients receiving TURP prior to hypofractionated radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: A scoping review.Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;42(6):165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.02.011. Epub 2024 Mar 19. Urol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38503591
-
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sao Paulo Med J. 2024 Dec 20;143(1):e2023324. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0324.R1.03072024. eCollection 2024. Sao Paulo Med J. 2024. PMID: 39774728 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Proton Beam Therapy.Int J Part Ther. 2021 Oct 20;8(4):14-24. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-21-00016. eCollection 2022 Spring. Int J Part Ther. 2021. PMID: 35530185 Free PMC article.
-
Acute toxicity and patient-reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer.J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Jun;69(2):198-207. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.551. Epub 2021 Oct 19. J Med Radiat Sci. 2022. PMID: 34664410 Free PMC article.
-
Current State of Personalized Genitourinary Cancer Radiotherapy in the Era of Precision Medicine.Front Oncol. 2021 May 7;11:675311. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.675311. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34026653 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A pooled patient-reported outcomes analysis of moderately hypofractionated proton beam therapy and photon-based intensity modulated radiation therapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Prostate. 2024 Mar;84(4):395-402. doi: 10.1002/pros.24660. Epub 2023 Dec 18. Prostate. 2024. PMID: 38108113 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Hypofractionation in Proton Therapy.Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 2;14(9):2271. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092271. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35565400 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG, et al. Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2016; 17(8): 1061–9. - PubMed
-
- Hoffman KE, Voong KR, Levy LB, et al. Randomized Trial of Hypofractionated, Dose-Escalated, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Versus Conventionally Fractionated IMRT for Localized Prostate Cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018; 36(29): 2943–9. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical