Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1356.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031356.

A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Health-Promoting Food Retail-Based Interventions

Huong Ngoc Quynh Tran  1   2 , Emma McMahon  3 , Marj Moodie  1   2 , Jaithri Ananthapavan  1   2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Health-Promoting Food Retail-Based Interventions

Huong Ngoc Quynh Tran et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: While the number of retail interventions with impacts on diet- and/or health-related outcomes is increasing, the economic evaluation literature is limited. This review investigated (i) the cost-effectiveness of health-promoting food retail interventions and (ii) key assumptions adopted in these evaluations.

Methods: A systematic review of published academic studies was undertaken (CRD42020153763). Fourteen databases were searched. Eligible studies were identified, analysed, and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results: Eight studies that evaluated 30 retail interventions were included in the review. Common outcomes reported were cost per healthy food item purchased/served or cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. Four studies undertook cost-utility analyses and half of these studies concluded that retail interventions were cost-effective in improving health outcomes. Most studies did not state any assumptions regarding compensatory behaviour (i.e., purchases/consumption of non-intervention foods or food purchases/consumption from non-intervention settings) and presumed that sales data were indicative of consumption.

Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness of retail-based health-promoting interventions is inconclusive. Future health-promoting retail interventions should regularly include an economic evaluation which addresses key assumptions related to compensatory behaviour and the use of sales data as a proxy for consumption.

Keywords: economic evaluation; food retail intervention; healthy diet; obesity prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flowchart summarising the inclusion and exclusion process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention effect pathway and assumptions. Notes: DALYs: Disability-adjusted life years, QALYs: Quality-adjusted life years.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Afshin A., Sur P.J., Fay K.A., Cornaby L., Ferrara G., Salama J.S., Mullany E.C., Abate K.H., Abbafati C., Abebe Z., et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393:1958–1972. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Noncommunicable Diseases Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. [(accessed on 18 September 2020)]; Available online: http://www.emro.who.int/noncommunicable-diseases/causes/unhealthy-diets.....
    1. World Health Organization Global Health Observatory (GHO) Data Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. [(accessed on 18 September 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/unhealthy_diet_text/en/
    1. Norat T., Chan D., Lau R., Aune D., Vieira R., Corpet D. WCRF/AICR Systematic Literature Review Continuous Update Project Report. World Cancer Research Fund; American Institute for Cancer Research; London, UK: 2010. The associations between food, nutrition and physical activity and the risk of colorectal cancer.
    1. World Health Organization . Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2003.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources