Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3051.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81204-9.

Probiotics as a treatment for prenatal maternal anxiety and depression: a double-blind randomized pilot trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Probiotics as a treatment for prenatal maternal anxiety and depression: a double-blind randomized pilot trial

Pamela D Browne et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Probiotic use may be an efficacious treatment option to effectively manage symptoms of prenatal maternal anxiety and depression. Our primary aim was to test feasibility and acceptability for a probiotic randomized controlled trial (RCT) in pregnant women with pre-existing symptoms. This double-blind pilot RCT included 40 pregnant women with low-risk pregnancies and elevated depressive symptoms and/or anxiety. Once daily, participants orally consumed a probiotic (Ecologic Barrier) or a placebo, from 26 to 30 weeks gestation until delivery. A priori key progression criteria for primary outcomes were determined to decide whether or not a full RCT was feasible and acceptable. Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms, anxiety, stress, and maternal bonding to offspring. In 19 months, 1573 women were screened; following screening, 155 women (10%) were invited for participation, of whom 135 (87%) received study information, and 40 women (30%) were included. Four out of six a priori determined criteria for success on feasibility and acceptability were met. After 8 weeks of intervention, there was no significant difference between the probiotic and placebo groups for secondary outcomes. The pilot trial was feasible and acceptable, but hampered by recruitment method and study design. Secondary endpoints did not reveal differences between the groups for improving maternal mood.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Eric Claassen is a consultant for several commercial parties in the field of probiotics; none of his advising practices are in direct conflict with the content of this pilot trial. Isolde Besseling-Van der Vaart is employed at Winclove Probiotics B.V. fulfilling the function of Manager Research Partnerships. The other authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participants’ flow through the study based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram. From the research database, participants were screened for eligibility and contacted by phone by the coordinating investigator whether they wanted to receive study information. Eligible participants who provided consent were randomized in either the probiotic or placebo group (t0). Measurements took place between baseline (t1) and 4 weeks post-partum (t2). Participants were recruited from March 2017 to September 2018.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reasons for declining study participation as a percentage of the total number of women who were invited to join the pilot trial and provided reasons for declining participation (N = 60).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Depressive symptom scores of women in the probiotic (N = 20) and placebo groups (N = 20) measured at baseline (t0), 8 weeks after probiotic/placebo intake (t1) and 4 weeks postpartum (t2). *p < 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Anxiety symptom scores of women in the probiotic (N = 20) and placebo groups (N = 20) measured at baseline (t0), 8 weeks after probiotic/placebo intake (t1) and 4 weeks postpartum (t2).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gelaye B, Rondon MB, Araya R, Williams MA. Epidemiology of maternal depression, risk factors, and child outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:973–982. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30284-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Accortt EE, Cheadle ACD, Dunkel Schetter C. Prenatal depression and adverse birth outcomes an updated systematic review. Matern. Child Health J. 2015;19:1306–1337. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1637-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Ravesteyn LM, van den Lambregtse Berg MP, Hoogendijk WJG, Kamperman AM. Interventions to treat mental disorders during pregnancy: a systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:0173397. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Pariante CM. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2016;191:62–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leigh B, Milgrom J. Risk factors for antenatal depression, postnatal depression and parenting stress. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-24. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types