Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3011.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82725-z.

Newborn screening of duchenne muscular dystrophy specifically targeting deletions amenable to exon-skipping therapy

Affiliations

Newborn screening of duchenne muscular dystrophy specifically targeting deletions amenable to exon-skipping therapy

Pablo Beckers et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a lethal progressive muscle-wasting disease. New treatment strategies relying on DMD gene exon-skipping therapy have recently been approved and about 30% of patients could be amenable to exon 51, 53 or 45 skipping. We evaluated the spectrum of deletions reported in DMD registries, and designed a method to screen newborns and identify DMD deletions amenable to exon 51, 53 and 45 skipping. We developed a multiplex qPCR assay identifying hemi(homo)-zygotic deletions of the flanking exons of these therapeutic targets in DMD exons (i.e. exons 44, 46, 50, 52 and 54). We conducted an evaluation of our new method in 51 male patients with a DMD phenotype, 50 female carriers of a DMD deletion and 19 controls. Studies were performed on dried blood spots with patient's consent. We analyzed qPCR amplification curves of controls, carriers, and DMD patients to discern the presence or the absence of the target exons. Analysis of the exons flanking the exon-skipping targets permitted the identification of patients that could benefit from exon-skipping. All samples were correctly genotyped, with either presence or absence of amplification of the target exon. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that this new assay is a highly sensitive method to identify DMD patients carrying deletions that are rescuable by exon-skipping treatment. The method is easily scalable to population-based screening. This targeted screening approach could address the new management paradigm in DMD, and could help to optimize the beneficial therapeutic effect of DMD therapies by permitting pre-symptomatic care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PB, LS, VB and FB declare a patent application for the present method (EP20165677.4). Remaining authors declare no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the results presented in this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Reading frame from exons 41 to 53 of DMD gene (upper frame). Example of the in-frame deletion of exons 45–47, which cannot benefit from exon-45 skipping (central frame). Example of the out-of-frame deletion of exons 46–49, which is amenable to exon-45 skipping (lower frame). (B) Number of patients with a large deletion (≥ 1 exon) covering at least one flanked exon reported in LOVD-DMD database. Deletions involving 35 or more patients are shown. Blue-bars point the deletions rescuable to either single exon-51, exon-53 or exon-45 skipping, red-bars correspond to deletion not rescuable by the aforementioned therapies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Amplification curves and scattered endpoint fluorescence of control group and carrier group, and DMD patients with a deletion of at least one target exon (deleted group). (A) Amplification curves of a patient without deletion of any target exons. (B) Amplification curves of a patient with a deletion of exons 50 to 54. (C) Normalized Fluorescence Ratio (NFR) of control and carrier group versus deleted group (i.e. DMD patients with a deletion overlapping at least one of the five target exons).

References

    1. Monaco AP, Bertelson CJ, Liechti-Gallati S, Moser H, Kunkel LM. An explanation for the phenotypic differences between patients bearing partial deletions of the DMD locus. Genomics. 1988;2:90–95. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(88)90113-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald CM, et al. Ataluren in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (ACT DMD): A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:1489–1498. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31611-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aartsma-Rus A, Van Deutekom JCT, Fokkema IF, Van Ommen GJB, Den Dunnen JT. Entries in the Leiden Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutation database: An overview of mutation types and paradoxical cases that confirm the reading-frame rule. Muscle Nerve. 2006;34:135–144. doi: 10.1002/mus.20586. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charleston JS, et al. Eteplirsen treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology. 2018;90:e2135–e2145. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005680. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frank DE, et al. Increased dystrophin production with golodirsen in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology. 2020 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009233. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources