Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Sep;26(9):4982-4998.
doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01036-x. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder after infectious disease pandemics in the twenty-first century, including COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder after infectious disease pandemics in the twenty-first century, including COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Kai Yuan et al. Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Pandemics have become more frequent and more complex during the twenty-first century. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following pandemics is a significant public health concern. We sought to provide a reliable estimate of the worldwide prevalence of PTSD after large-scale pandemics as well as associated risk factors, by a systematic review and meta-analysis. We systematically searched the MedLine, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, medRxiv, and bioRxiv databases to identify studies that were published from the inception up to August 23, 2020, and reported the prevalence of PTSD after pandemics including sudden acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), H1N1, Poliomyelitis, Ebola, Zika, Nipah, Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), H5N1, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A total of 88 studies were included in the analysis, with 77 having prevalence information and 70 having risk factors information. The overall pooled prevalence of post-pandemic PTSD across all populations was 22.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.9-25.4%, I2: 99.7%). Healthcare workers had the highest prevalence of PTSD (26.9%; 95% CI: 20.3-33.6%), followed by infected cases (23.8%: 16.6-31.0%), and the general public (19.3%: 15.3-23.2%). However, the heterogeneity of study findings indicates that results should be interpreted cautiously. Risk factors including individual, family, and societal factors, pandemic-related factors, and specific factors in healthcare workers and patients for post-pandemic PTSD were summarized and discussed in this systematic review. Long-term monitoring and early interventions should be implemented to improve post-pandemic mental health and long-term recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flow chart of study selection.
Among 88 eligible studies included in the meta-analysis, 77 included prevalence information and 70 included risk factor information.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Combined prevalence of post-pandemic PTSD.
The estimated prevalence of PTSD after the pandemics was 22.6%. ES: estimated prevalence; CI: confidence interval; Subtotal: estimated prevalence of each subgroup.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Subgroup analysis of post-pandemic PTSD prevalence across variables.
Estimated prevalence of each subgroups of Post-trauma duration, Gender, Regions, Quarantine experience, Diagnostic methods, Infections disease and Frontline work experience are provided. P value less than 0.05 refers to statistical difference in subgroups. CI: confidence interval.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Begg’s funnel plot.
Begg’s funnel plot indicated no apparent publication bias and Begg’s and Egger’s tests confirmed that (p value of both Begg’s and Egger’s tests are greater than 0.05). r: estimated prevalence.

References

    1. Bedford J, Farrar J, Ihekweazu C, Kang G, Koopmans M, Nkengasong J. A new twenty-first century science for effective epidemic response. Nature. 2019;575:130–6. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1717-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giesecke J. The truth about PHEICs. Lancet. 2019. 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31566-1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lupia T, Scabini S, Mornese Pinna S, Di Perri G, De Rosa FG, Corcione S. 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak: a new challenge. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;21:22–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.02.021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Madhav N, Oppenheim B, Gallivan M, Mulembakani P, Rubin E, Wolfe N. Pandemics: risks, impacts, and mitigation. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2017. 10.1596/978-1-4648-0527-1/pt5.ch17. - PubMed
    1. Terhakopian A, Benedek DM. Hospital disaster preparedness: mental and behavioral health interventions for infectious disease outbreaks and bioterrorism incidents. Am J Disaster Med. 2007;2:43–50. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2007.0008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types