Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 29;26(1):e46-e51.
doi: 10.1093/pch/pxz159. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Neonatal follow-up programs in Canada: A national survey

Fawaz Albaghli  1 , Paige Church  2 , Marilyn Ballantyne  3 , Alberta Girardi  4 , Anne Synnes  1
Affiliations

Neonatal follow-up programs in Canada: A national survey

Fawaz Albaghli et al. Paediatr Child Health. .

Abstract

Background: A 2006 Canadian survey showed a large variability in neonatal follow-up practices. In 2010, all 26 tertiary level Neonatal Follow-Up clinics joined the Canadian Neonatal Follow-Up Network (CNFUN) and agreed to implement a standardized assessment (including the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III (Bayley-III) at 18 months corrected age for children born < 29 weeks' gestation. It is unknown whether the variability in follow-up practices lessened as a result.

Objectives: To describe the current status of neonatal follow-up services in Canada and changes over time.

Methods: A comprehensive online survey was sent to all tertiary level CNFUN Follow-up programs. Questions were based on previous survey results, current literature, and investigator expertise and consensus.

Results: Respondents included 23 of 26 (88%) CNFUN programs. All sites provide neurodevelopmental screening and referrals in a multidisciplinary setting with variations in staffing. CNFUN programs vary with most offering five to seven visits. Since 2006, assessments at 18 months CA increased from 84% to 91% of sites, Bayley-III use increased from 21% to 74% (P=0.001) and eligibility for follow-up was expanded for children with stroke, congenital diaphragmatic hernia and select anomalies detected in utero. Audit data is collected by > 80% of tertiary programs.

Conclusion: Care became more consistent after CNFUN; 18-month assessments and Bayley-III use increased significantly. However, marked variability in follow-up practices persists.

Keywords: Canada; Health services; Neonatal follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Neonatal follow-up schedule of visits in Canada.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Canadian NFU programs team members and health disciplines.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ballantyne M, Stevens B, Guttmann A, Willan AR, Rosenbaum P. Transition to neonatal follow-up programs: Is attendance a problem? J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2012;26(1):90–8. - PubMed
    1. Kuppala VS, Tabangin M, Haberman B, Steichen J, Yolton K. Current state of high-risk infant follow-up care in the United States: Results of a national survey of academic follow-up programs. J Perinatol 2012;32(4):293–8. - PubMed
    1. Bockli K, Andrews B, Pellerite M, Meadow W. Trends and challenges in United States neonatal intensive care units follow-up clinics. J Perinatol 2014;34(1):71–4. - PubMed
    1. Hanvey L Neonatal follow-up in Canada: Report of a survey, 1987. In: Feldman W, Paré C, eds. Neonatal Follow-up Programs in Canada. Proceedings of Ross Conference in Paediatrics. Montreal: Ross Laboratories, Division of Abbott Laboratories Ltd, 1987.
    1. Cake HA, Jangaard K, Pelausa E, Sampson D, Vincer M. A survey of Canadian perinatal follow-up programs. Paediatr Child Health. 1997;2Suppl 1:51A.