Community Rehabilitation Outcomes for Different Stroke Diagnoses: An Observational Cohort Study
- PMID: 33543075
- PMCID: PMC7853334
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100047
Community Rehabilitation Outcomes for Different Stroke Diagnoses: An Observational Cohort Study
Erratum in
-
Correction.Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Jul 27;4(3):100222. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100222. eCollection 2022 Sep. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022. PMID: 36123977 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the differences in functional and cognitive rehabilitation gains made in community-based rehabilitation following a stroke based on stroke diagnosis (left or right hemisphere, hemorrhagic, or ischemic).
Design: A 12-month follow-up observational retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation.
Participants: Clients (N=61) with hemorrhagic left brain stroke (n=10), hemorrhagic right brain stroke (n=8), ischemic left brain stroke (n=27), or ischemic right brain stroke (n=16) participating in rehabilitation for at least 12 months.
Intervention: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: The Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) was completed at admission and 12 months post admission to staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation by consensus of a multidisciplinary team.
Results: After 12 months in staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation, the study population made significant gains in Total (P<.001) and across Ability (P<.001) and Participation (P<.001) subscales of the MPAI-4. All diagnostic groups made significant gains in Participation T-scores, and no groups made significant gains in Adjustment. The ischemic left and right hemisphere stroke groups also made significant gains in Ability and Total T-scores from admission to 12 months. Clients with ischemic left hemisphere stroke had more severe limitations in motor speech (P<.05) than clients with right hemisphere stroke at admission and/or review and were also more impaired in verbal communication (P<.01) than the hemorrhagic right hemisphere group at admission.
Conclusions: There are some differences in outcomes on presentation to rehabilitation based on type of stroke; there are also differences in rehabilitation gains. Improvement in physical ability does not always translate to improvement in social participation and independence; those with right brain stroke need further assistance to translate physical gains into participatory outcomes.
Keywords: ABI, acquired brain injury; ANOVA, analysis of variance; Brain injuries; MPAI-4, Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4); Rehabilitation; Stroke.
© 2020 The Authors.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization Global health estimates 2012. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/ Available at: Accessed July 18, 2018.
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . AIHW; Canberra: 2018. Australia's health 2018.
-
- Lynch E.A., Mackintosh S., Luker J.A., Hillier S.L. Access to rehabilitation for patients with stroke in Australia. Med J Aust. 2019;210:21–26. - PubMed
-
- Fisher R.J., Walker M.F., Golton I., Jenkinson D. The implementation of evidence-based rehabilitation services for stroke survivors living in the community: the results of a Delphi consensus process. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:741–749. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
