Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 4;2(2):100047.
doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100047. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Community Rehabilitation Outcomes for Different Stroke Diagnoses: An Observational Cohort Study

Affiliations

Community Rehabilitation Outcomes for Different Stroke Diagnoses: An Observational Cohort Study

Elly Williams et al. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. .

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Jul 27;4(3):100222. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100222. eCollection 2022 Sep. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022. PMID: 36123977 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the differences in functional and cognitive rehabilitation gains made in community-based rehabilitation following a stroke based on stroke diagnosis (left or right hemisphere, hemorrhagic, or ischemic).

Design: A 12-month follow-up observational retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation.

Participants: Clients (N=61) with hemorrhagic left brain stroke (n=10), hemorrhagic right brain stroke (n=8), ischemic left brain stroke (n=27), or ischemic right brain stroke (n=16) participating in rehabilitation for at least 12 months.

Intervention: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: The Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) was completed at admission and 12 months post admission to staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation by consensus of a multidisciplinary team.

Results: After 12 months in staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation, the study population made significant gains in Total (P<.001) and across Ability (P<.001) and Participation (P<.001) subscales of the MPAI-4. All diagnostic groups made significant gains in Participation T-scores, and no groups made significant gains in Adjustment. The ischemic left and right hemisphere stroke groups also made significant gains in Ability and Total T-scores from admission to 12 months. Clients with ischemic left hemisphere stroke had more severe limitations in motor speech (P<.05) than clients with right hemisphere stroke at admission and/or review and were also more impaired in verbal communication (P<.01) than the hemorrhagic right hemisphere group at admission.

Conclusions: There are some differences in outcomes on presentation to rehabilitation based on type of stroke; there are also differences in rehabilitation gains. Improvement in physical ability does not always translate to improvement in social participation and independence; those with right brain stroke need further assistance to translate physical gains into participatory outcomes.

Keywords: ABI, acquired brain injury; ANOVA, analysis of variance; Brain injuries; MPAI-4, Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4); Rehabilitation; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
MPAI-4 radar chart showing median change in 29 items from admission to 12 months post admission for the total cohort (n=61). Items are arranged as spokes in the wheel. MPAI-4 scores are inverted, and levels are arranged from severe problem/limitation at the center (4) to no problem/limitation on the outer perimeter (0). The red line represents scores on admission to staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation, and the blue line represents scores following 12 months of staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation.
Fig 2
Fig 2
MPAI-4 radar charts showing median change in 29 items from admission to 12 months post admission for each type of stroke cohort. These show at a glance rehabilitation outcomes for each cohort across 12 months of staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Global health estimates 2012. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/ Available at: Accessed July 18, 2018.
    1. Johnson C., Minh N., Roth G. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:459–480. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . AIHW; Canberra: 2018. Australia's health 2018.
    1. Lynch E.A., Mackintosh S., Luker J.A., Hillier S.L. Access to rehabilitation for patients with stroke in Australia. Med J Aust. 2019;210:21–26. - PubMed
    1. Fisher R.J., Walker M.F., Golton I., Jenkinson D. The implementation of evidence-based rehabilitation services for stroke survivors living in the community: the results of a Delphi consensus process. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:741–749. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources