Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:1295:243-270.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58174-9_11.

3D Tumor Spheroid Models for In Vitro Therapeutic Screening of Nanoparticles

Affiliations

3D Tumor Spheroid Models for In Vitro Therapeutic Screening of Nanoparticles

Simonas Daunys et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021.

Abstract

The anticancer activity of compounds and nanoparticles is most often determined in the cell monolayer. However, three-dimensional (3D) systems, such as tumor spheroids, are more representing the natural tumor microenvironment. They have been shown to have higher invasiveness and resistance to cytotoxic agents and radiotherapy compared to cells growing in 2D monolayer. Furthermore, to improve the prediction of clinical efficacy of drugs, in the past decades, even more sophisticated systems, such as multicellular 3D cultures, closely representing natural tumor microenvironment have been developed. Those cultures are formed from either cell lines or patient-derived tumor cells. Such models are very attractive and could improve the selection of tested materials for clinical trials avoiding unnecessary expensive tests in vivo. The microenvironment in tumor spheroids is different, and those differences or the interaction between several cell populations may contribute to different tumor response to the treatment. Also, different types of nanoparticles may have different behavior in 3D models, depending on their nature, physicochemical properties, the presence of targeting ligands on the surface, etc. Therefore, it is very important to understand in which cases which type of tumor spheroid is more suitable for testing specific types of nanoparticles, which conditions should be used, and which analytical method should be applied.

Keywords: 3D culture; Bioprinting; Cellular heterogeneity; Multicellular; Nanoparticle; Penetration; Screening; Toxicity; Tumor spheroid; Tumorosphere.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Costa, E. C., Moreira, A. F., de Melo-Diogo, D., Gaspar, V. M., Carvalho, M. P., & Correia, I. J. (2016). 3D tumor spheroids: An overview on the tools and techniques used for their analysis. Biotechnology Advances, 34(8), 1427–1441. - PubMed - DOI - PMC
    1. Baker, B. M., & Chen, C. S. (2012). Deconstructing the third dimension: How 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. Journal of Cell Science, 125(Pt 13), 3015–3024. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Huang, S., & Ingber, D. E. (1999). The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control. Nature Cell Biology, 1(5), E131–E138. - PubMed - DOI - PMC
    1. Januškevičienė, I., & Petrikaitė, V. (2019). Heterogeneity of breast cancer: The importance of interaction between different tumor cell populations. Life Sciences, 239, 117009. - PubMed - DOI - PMC
    1. Halfter, K., Hoffmann, O., Ditsch, N., Ahne, M., Arnold, F., Paepke, S., et al. (2016). Testing chemotherapy efficacy in HER2 negative breast cancer using patient-derived spheroids. Journal of Translational Medicine, 14, 112. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855689/ . - PubMed - PMC - DOI

LinkOut - more resources