Patient selection for islet or solid organ pancreas transplantation: experiences from a multidisciplinary outpatient-clinic approach
- PMID: 33544090
- PMCID: PMC7983483
- DOI: 10.1530/EC-20-0519
Patient selection for islet or solid organ pancreas transplantation: experiences from a multidisciplinary outpatient-clinic approach
Abstract
Objective: β-cell replacement therapy (βCRT), including pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) and islet transplantation (ITX), is a treatment option for selected type 1 diabetes patients. All potential candidates for βCRT in Norway are referred to one national transplant centre for evaluation before any pre-transplant workup is started. This evaluation was performed by a transplant nephrologist alone prior to 2015 and by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) from 2015. We have reviewed the allocation of patients to treatment modality and the 1-year clinical outcome for the patients after transplantation.
Research design and methods: Medical charts of all patients evaluated for βCRT between 2010 and 2020 in Norway were retrospectively analysed and the outcome of patients receiving βCRT were studied.
Results: One hundred and forty-four patients were assessed for βCRT eligibility between 2010 and 2020. After MDT evaluation was introduced for βCRT eligibility in 2015, the percentage of referred patients accepted for the transplant waiting list fell from 84% to 40% (P < 0.005). One year after transplantation, 73% of the PTA and none of the ITX patients were independent of exogenous insulin, 8% of the PTA and 90% of the ITX patients had partial graft function while 19% of the PTA and 10% of the ITX patients suffered from graft loss.
Conclusion: The acceptance rate for βCRT was significantly reduced during a 10-year observation period and 81% of the PTA and 90% of the ITX patients had partial or normal graft function 1 year post-transplant.
Keywords: diabetes; metabolism.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The IKEM pancreas and islet transplant program as part of healthcare for type 1 diabetes patients: retrospective analysis of outcome from 1983 to 2010.Rev Diabet Stud. 2011 Spring;8(1):35-43. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2011.8.35. Epub 2011 May 10. Rev Diabet Stud. 2011. PMID: 21720671 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits of Islet Transplantation as an Alternative to Pancreas Transplantation: Retrospective Study of More Than 10 Ten Years of Experience in a Single Center.Rev Diabet Stud. 2017 Spring;14(1):10-21. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2017.14.10. Epub 2017 Jun 12. Rev Diabet Stud. 2017. PMID: 28632818 Free PMC article.
-
Tacrolimus in pancreas transplantation: a multicenter analysis. Tacrolimus Pancreas Transplant Study Group.Clin Transplant. 1997 Aug;11(4):299-312. Clin Transplant. 1997. PMID: 9267719 Clinical Trial.
-
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004.Clin Transplant. 2005 Aug;19(4):433-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00378.x. Clin Transplant. 2005. PMID: 16008587 Review.
-
Current outcomes in islet versus solid organ pancreas transplant for β-cell replacement in type 1 diabetes.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2016 Aug;21(4):399-404. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000332. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2016. PMID: 27258578 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances and challenges of the cell-based therapies among diabetic patients.J Transl Med. 2024 May 8;22(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05226-3. J Transl Med. 2024. PMID: 38720379 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Horneland R, Paulsen V, Lindahl JP, Grzyb K, Eide TJ, Lundin K, Aabakken L, Jenssen T, Aandahl EM, Foss Aet al. Pancreas transplantation with enteroanastomosis to native duodenum poses technical challenges – but offers improved endoscopic access for scheduled biopsies and therapeutic interventions. American Journal of Transplantation 2015. 15 242–2. (10.1111/ajt.12953) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lindahl JP, Horneland R, Nordheim E, Hartmann A, Aandahl EM, Grzyb K, Haugaa H, Kjosen G, Asberg A, Jenssen T.Outcomes in pancreas transplantation with exocrine drainage through a duodenoduodenostomy versus duodenojejunostomy. American Journal of Transplantation 2018. 18 154–162. (10.1111/ajt.14420) - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources