Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3349-e3354.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1307.

Change in Fibrosis 4 Index as Predictor of High Risk of Incident Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Eradication of Hepatitis C Virus

Affiliations

Change in Fibrosis 4 Index as Predictor of High Risk of Incident Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Eradication of Hepatitis C Virus

Nobuharu Tamaki et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether the fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), a marker of liver fibrosis, at baseline and change in FIB-4 after sustained virological response (SVR) is associated with incident hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk. In this study, we examined the association of incident HCC risk with baseline FIB-4 and sustained high FIB-4 (>3.25) at any time point after SVR.

Methods: A total of 3823 patients who received direct-acting antiviral treatment and achieved SVR were enrolled. The FIB-4 was measured 24 weeks after the end of direct-acting antiviral treatment and achievement of SVR (SVR24), and 1, 2, and 3 years after SVR24, after which subsequent HCC development was investigated.

Results: In patients with an FIB-4 >3.25 at SVR24 and 1, 2, and 3 years after SVR24, subsequent HCC development was significantly higher than in those with an FIB-4 ≤3.25 at each point. The rates of HCC development 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after SVR24 were significantly higher in patients with sustained FIB-4 >3.25 than in those whose FIB-4 decreased to ≤3.25 (5.4%, 9.2%, 11.7%, and 16.0%, respectively, vs 2.2%, 3.1%, 3.7%, and 4.4%; P < .001). The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for an FIB-4 >3.25 at SVR24 and 1, 2, and 3 years later were 3.38 (2.4-4.8), 2.95 (1.9-4.7), 2.62 (1.3-5.1), and 3.37 (1.4-9.8), respectively.

Conclusions: The FIB-4 could be used to assess HCC development risk at any time after SVR, and changes in FIB-4 were associated with changes in the HCC development risk. Repeated assessments of FIB-4 could serve as a prognostic indicator of a high-risk HCC cohort that may require more intensive HCC surveillance strategy.

Keywords: DAA; FIB-4; SVR; hepatocellular carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of patient selection. Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; SVR, sustained virological response.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Change in proportion of high-risk patients (fibrosis 4 index [FIB-4] >3.25) over time. Abbreviation: SVR24, 24 weeks after achievement of sustained virological response.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cumulative rates of hepatocellular carcinoma development after sustained virological response (SVR) stratified by fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4). Patients were classified into 2 groups according to FIB-4 at 24 weeks after achievement of SVR (SVR24) (A) and 1 (B), 2 (C), and 3 (D) years after SVR24.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development after sustained virological response (SVR) stratified by change in fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4). In patients with FIB-4 >3.25 at 24 weeks after achievement of SVR (SVR24), patients were categorized into 2 groups according to changes in FIB-4. Patients with FIB-4 ≤3.25 at last follow-up or at the time of HCC development were classified in the improvement group, and those with FIB-4 >3.25 at last follow-up or at the time of HCC development were classified in the nonimprovement group.

References

    1. Afdhal N, Reddy KR, Nelson DR, et al. ; ION-2 Investigators . Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1483–93. - PubMed
    1. Mizokami M, Yokosuka O, Takehara T, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir fixed-dose combination with and without ribavirin for 12 weeks in treatment-naive and previously treated Japanese patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15:645–53. - PubMed
    1. Akahane T, Kurosaki M, Itakura J, et al. Real-world efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir + ribavirin for hepatitis C genotype 2: a nationwide multicenter study by the Japanese Red Cross Liver Study Group. Hepatol Res 2019; 49:264–70. - PubMed
    1. Kusakabe A, Kurosaki M, Itakura J, et al. Efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir as retreatment therapy for patients with genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C who failed prior sofosbuvir plus ribavirin regimen. Hepatol Res 2019; 49:1121–6. - PubMed
    1. Mashiba T, Joko K, Kurosaki M, et al. Real-world efficacy of elbasvir and grazoprevir for hepatitis C virus (genotype 1): a nationwide, multicenter study by the Japanese Red Cross Hospital Liver Study Group. Hepatol Res 2019; 49:1114–20. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances