Callosal angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: small angular mal-rotations of the coronal plane affect measurement reliability
- PMID: 33544172
- DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02658-2
Callosal angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: small angular mal-rotations of the coronal plane affect measurement reliability
Abstract
Purpose: The callosal angle (CA) is a useful biomarker in the diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Used incorrectly, CA measurements are variable, affecting its reliability as a clinical tool. Our objectives are to evaluate (i) reproducibility of established CA measurements between trained raters and (ii) impact of minor angular mal-rotations of the true coronal plane on CA measurements.
Methods: CAs were measured by two independent raters on three-dimensional isovolumetric T1-weighted brain MRI of NPH patients and healthy controls using the established true coronal plane reformatted orthogonal to the plane containing the anterior-posterior commissural (AC-PC) line at the level of the posterior commissure. CA changes were subsequently evaluated when the coronal plane was mal-rotated by ± 5° and ± 10° in anterior-posterior and clockwise-anticlockwise directions. Inter-rater reliability of CA measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results: On the true coronal plane, inter-rater ICC was excellent (0.973) for NPH patients and good (0.875) for controls. On mal-rotated coronal plane setups, ICC for CA was worse in controls (0.484-0.886) than NPH (0.879-0.981) groups and in clockwise-anticlockwise (0.484-0.956) than anterior-posterior (0.503-0.981) mal-rotations. CA changes secondary to mal-rotations from the true coronal plane were significant in NPH patients (P < 0.0001 to 0.0378) but not in controls (P > 0.1).
Conclusion: This is the first demonstration of how small angular mal-rotations of the coronal plane used for CA measurement affect its value and inter-rater reliability, highlighting the importance of a standardized protocol when measuring the CA in NPH workup.
Keywords: Callosal angle; Diagnosis; Normal-pressure hydrocephalus; Test-retest reliability.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH (1965) Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. N Engl J Med. 273(3):117–126. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196507152730301 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, Kazui H, Miyake H, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, Hashimoto M, Kuriyama N, Tokuda T, Ishii K, Kaijima M, Hirata Y, Saito M, Arai H (2012) Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 52(11):775–778. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.52.775 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM (2005) Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57(3 Suppl):S4-16; discussion ii-v.
-
- Silverberg GD, Mayo M, Saul T, Rubenstein E, McGuire D (2003) Alzheimer’s disease, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, and senescent changes in CSF circulatory physiology: a hypothesis. Lancet Neurol 2(8):506–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00487-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kockum K, Lilja-Lund O, Larsson EM, Rosell M, Söderström L, Virhammar J, Laurell K (2018) The idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus Radscale: a radiological scale for structured evaluation. Eur J Neurol 25(3):569–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13555 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
