Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;32(5):1038-1047.
doi: 10.1111/pai.13464. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

Food allergy treatment value: Child caregiver and patient perspectives

Affiliations

Food allergy treatment value: Child caregiver and patient perspectives

Moaz Abdelwadoud et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Food allergy is a major health problem that significantly impacts quality of life (QoL). There is growing focus to evaluate food allergy-related QoL and treatment options' value beyond the clinical effectiveness perspective by engaging patients and caregivers. We aimed to identify and prioritize outcomes important to food allergy parents of children and patients allergic to milk, egg, and/or peanut, to guide comparative effectiveness research (CER) that focuses on evaluating food allergy treatment decisions.

Methods: We conducted a modified 3-round Delphi study to identify and derive consensus on priority treatment outcomes for parents of children and adult patients with diagnosed allergies to at least one of three major allergenic foods (milk, egg, and peanut) from across the United States.

Results: Round 1 yielded 44 statements for round 2, and 39 statements reached the agreement level for round 3 ranking. Statements were organized under 4 sections: 1) food allergy problems, 2) treatment experiences, 3) important treatment outcomes, and 4) value of different treatment options.

Conclusion: Food allergy parents and patients face several social, psychological, medical, healthcare, financial, food selection, and awareness challenges. The areas of consensus on important treatment outcomes revealed shared priority for reducing the risk of potentially fatal allergic reactions and having reliable treatments. The most valued treatment options reflect hope for permanent cure and fear of serious allergic reactions.

Keywords: caregivers; comparative effectiveness research; delphi technique; food allergy; food hypersensitivity; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Sanaz Eftekhari, Hannah Jaffee, and Melanie Carver are employed by the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA), a non‐profit patient organization, which has received food allergy‐related funding from Aimmune, DBV Technologies, Genentech, kaléo, Mylan, Pfizer, and PhRMA.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overview of delphi process
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Panelists’ important treatment outcomes and most valued treatments

References

    1. Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(2):291‐307.e5. - PubMed
    1. Gupta RS, Warren CM, Smith BM, et al. The public health impact of parent‐reported childhood food allergies in the United States. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6):e20181235. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta RS, Warren CM, Smith BM, et al. Prevalence and severity of food allergies among US adults. JAMA Netw open. 2019;2(1):e185630. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(2 SUPPL. 2): 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.08.028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenhawt M. Food allergy quality of life and living with food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;16(3):284‐290. 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000271 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types