All-Inside PCL Reconstruction
- PMID: 33545733
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722313
All-Inside PCL Reconstruction
Abstract
Many different techniques with multiple graft types have been described for the reconstruction of the injured posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); autograft versus allograft, single- versus double-bundle, open inlay versus arthroscopic inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial, and recently described the arthroscopic "all-inside" socket technique. Reported clinical outcomes have demonstrated no significant difference in any of these PCL reconstruction techniques, likely because of the heterogeneity in injury characteristics and patient population. The ideal surgical technique should be safe, simple, and reproducible while allowing treatment of concomitant knee injuries resulting and return to function.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
A.P. reports nonfinancial support from Stryker Corporation, outside the submitted work. M.J.S. reports other from American Journal of Sports Medicine, grants and personal fees from Arthrex, Inc, grants from Stryker, outside the submitted work. B.A.L. reports personal fees from Arthrex, Inc: IP royalties; Paid consultant, grants from Biomet: Research support, other from Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research: Editorial or governing board, other from Journal of Knee Surgery: Editorial or governing board, other from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Editorial or governing board, other from Orthopedics Today: Editorial or governing board, grants and personal fees from Smith & Nephew: Paid consultant; Research support, grants from Stryker: Research support, personal fees from Linvatec: Faculty/speaker, personal fees from COVR Medical LLC, outside the submitted work.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
