Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e24328.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024328.

Prognostic impact of eosinophils in peripheral blood and tumor site in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Affiliations

Prognostic impact of eosinophils in peripheral blood and tumor site in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Xiyue Yang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

To date, no effective biological markers have been identified for predicting the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients. Recent studies have shown that eosinophils are independent prognostic factors in some cancers. This study aimed to identify the prognostic impact of eosinophils in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).This study enrolled 136 patients who received CCRT for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We evaluated the survival time and clinical pathological characteristics of eosinophils. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival data. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to conduct a multivariate analysis.Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that high eosinophil infiltration correlated with better overall survival (OS) (P = .008) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (P = .015). The increase in absolute eosinophil count after CCRT also enhanced OS (P = .005) and PFS (P = .007). The PFS and OS in patients with high blood eosinophil count before CCRT (>2%) was better than those with low blood eosinophil count(<2%) (P = .006 and P = .001, respectively). Additionally, the multivariate analysis revealed that disease stage and high eosinophil infiltration, increased peripheral blood absolute eosinophil count after CCRT, and high peripheral blood eosinophil count before CCRT were independent prognostic indicators.High eosinophil count of tumor site, increased peripheral blood absolute eosinophil count after CCRT, and high peripheral blood eosinophil count before CCRT are favorable prognostic factors for patients with ESCC treated with CCRT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Infiltration of eosinophils into the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) tissues. Eosinophils, the cytoplasmic granules of which are stained bright red, are easily recognizable from other tissues (original magnification 200 × ).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients with ESCC: High eosinophil infiltration in ESCC correlated with better overall survival (OS) (P = .008; log-rank test) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (P = .015; log-rank test) compared with low or intermediate eosinophil infiltration.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients with ESCC: The increase in blood absolute eosinophil count after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was positively correlated with patient survival. It had enhanced OS (P = .005; log-rank test) and PFS (P = .007; log-rank test).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients with ESCC: The OS and PFS of patients with high blood eosinophil count before CCRT (>2%) was better than those with low blood eosinophil count (<2%) and had significant differences (P = .001 and P = .006, respectively; log-rank test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359–86. - PubMed
    1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2241–52. 10.1056/NEJMra035010. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277–300. - PubMed
    1. Li-Li Zhu, Ling Yuan, HuInt J, et al. A meta-analysis of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. PLoS One 2015;10:e0128616.Mol Sci. 2014 jun; 15 (6):9718-9734. - PMC - PubMed