Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1428.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041428.

Opinions Towards Key Operational Aspects for the Implementation of HIV Self-Testing in Spain: A Comparison between Stakeholders and Potential Users

Juan Hoyos  1 , Juan-Miguel Guerras  2   3 , Tomás Maté  4 , Cristina Agustí  2   5 , Laura Fernández-López  2   5 , Luis de la Fuente  2   3 , María-José Belza  2   6
Affiliations

Opinions Towards Key Operational Aspects for the Implementation of HIV Self-Testing in Spain: A Comparison between Stakeholders and Potential Users

Juan Hoyos et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

We assessed previous knowledge about the existence of HIV self-testing of stakeholders in Spain, as well as their personal position towards this methodology. We also assessed their views on potential users' (PU) opinions towards several key operational aspects surrounding self-testing, and compared them to those expressed by a sample of PU comprised of men who have sex with men. In 2017, we recruited three types of stakeholders: public health professionals and policy makers (PHPPM) (n = 33), clinical providers (n = 290) and community-based/non-governmental organization (CBO/NGO) workers (n = 55). Data on PU (n = 3537) were collected in 2016. Previous knowledge about the existence of self-testing was higher in stakeholders than in PU, but being in favor was less frequent. PUs' willingness to pay 25-30 euros for a self-test was higher than that which stakeholders considered. According to clinical providers and PHPPM, pharmacies would be PUs' preferred place to obtain a self-test, which was in line with PUs' actual choice. CBO/NGO workers on the other hand thought it would be CBO/NGOs. PHPPM and clinical providers considered primary care as PUs' preferred setting to confirm a reactive self-test and CBO/NGO chose CBO/NGOs, but PUs preferred an HIV/STI testing service or clinic. Stakeholders' opinions significantly differed from those of PUs. This divergence needs to be brought up to stakeholders as it could vary their position towards self-testing as well as the actions taken in the implementation of a testing option with the potential of increasing testing frequency.

Keywords: early diagnosis; men who have sex with men; self-testing; stakeholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Brown A.E., Hayes R., Noori T., Azad Y., Amato-Gauci A.J., Pharris A., Delpech V.C. HIV in Europe and Central Asia: Progress in 2018 towards meeting the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. Eurosurveillance. 2018;23:1800622. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.48.1800622. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention . HIV Testing: Increasing Uptake and Effectiveness in the European Union. ECDC; Stockholm, Sweden: 2010. [(accessed on 15 November 2020)]. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publ....
    1. Frith L. HIV self-testing: A time to revise current policy. Lancet. 2007;369:243–245. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60113-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walensky R.P., Paltiel A.D. Rapid HIV testing at home: Does it solve a problem or create one? Ann. Intern. Med. 2006;145:459–462. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spielberg F., Levine R.O., Weaver M. Self-testing for HIV: A new option for HIV prevention? Lancet Infect. Dis. 2004;4:640–646. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01150-8. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources