Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;30(6):759-776.
doi: 10.1177/0963662521990848. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

Interactions between emotional and cognitive engagement with science on YouTube

Ilana Dubovi  1 , Iris Tabak  2
Affiliations

Interactions between emotional and cognitive engagement with science on YouTube

Ilana Dubovi et al. Public Underst Sci. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

This study aimed to map and characterize public engagement with science on YouTube. A two-part study was conducted. First, we collected and quantitatively analyzed trending videos on YouTube to evaluate the magnitude of public interaction with science content. Then, we assessed actual, rather than self-reports of, media interactions with science-related YouTube trending videos. We tested associations between behavioral engagement of viewing, liking, disliking or commenting, and emotional and cognitive engagement. Our findings affirm that science content attracts high public interest and that emotional and cognitive engagement with science on social media are distinct, but interrelated. We show that regardless of the valence of emotional engagement, emotion is linked to greater behavioral engagement of posting comments and to greater cognitive engagement of argumentative deliberation. Therefore, our findings suggest that social media interactions, which tend to evoke emotional responses, are a promising means of advancing person-to-person engagement with science.

Keywords: YouTube; argumentation; behavioral engagement; cognitive engagement; emotional engagement; public engagement in science; sentiment analysis; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) mean number of views per category and (b) Mean number of post-video comments per category.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Sentiment analysis: Amount of emotional expressions per video (Mean ± SD; median; 10–90 percentile range).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alexa Internet Inc. (2020) The top 500 sites on the web. Available at: https://www.alexa.com/topsites
    1. Amarasekara I, Grant WJ. (2018) Exploring the YouTube science communication gender gap: A sentiment analysis. Public Understanding of Science 28: 68–84. - PubMed
    1. Arastoopour Irgens G, Dabholkar S, Bain C, Woods P, Hall K, Swanson H, et al.. (2020) Modeling and measuring high school students’ computational thinking practices in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology 29: 137–161.
    1. Asterhan CSC, Hever R. (2015) Learning from reading argumentive group discussions in Facebook: Rhetoric style matters (again). Computers in Human Behavior 53: 570–576.
    1. Bhattacharya S, Srinivasan P, Polgreen P. (2014) Engagement with health agencies on Twitter. PLoS One 9: e112235. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources