Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 5;21(1):105.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01976-z.

Intergenerational caring: a systematic literature review on young and young adult caregivers of older people

Barbara D'Amen  1 , Marco Socci  2 , Sara Santini  1
Affiliations

Intergenerational caring: a systematic literature review on young and young adult caregivers of older people

Barbara D'Amen et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: The theme of young family caregivers of older relatives is still partially uncovered, although the phenomenon is increasing worldwide. This Systematic Literature Review discusses methodological and content issues of ten articles covering this topic, in order to contribute to increase the knowledge and provide suggestions for designing effective support services for adolescent young caregivers. To this purpose, the findings of this review are framed within the caregiving stress appraisal model (renamed CSA model) elaborated by Yates' and collegues, in order to highlight differences between young caregivers and the older ones.

Methods: Multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest - Psychology Database, CINAHL Complete - EBSCOHost were used to carry out a systematic review of the literature. Additional references were retrieved from experts contacted and research knowledge. The selected articles underwent both methodological appraisal and contents analysis: for every article an appraisal score was calculated and themes and sub-themes were identified.

Results: Out of the ten included studies three were mixed methods, six qualitative and one quantitative. Nine reached a high quality methodological score and one medium. Four main themes emerged from the content analysis: aspects of the caregiving relationship; effects of caregiving; coping strategies; recommendations for services, policy and research.

Conclusions: Selected studies explored practical features of the relationship between young caregivers and older family members (tasks performed, motivations, coping strategies) and highlighted both positive and negative outcomes on young people's everyday life condition and future development. Nevertheless, these evidences were often limited to small samples that did not allow to make generalizations. More studies are needed including large samples in order to deepen the different aspects of caregiving and design tailored support services.

Keywords: Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT); Older people; Systematic literature review; Young adult caregivers; Young caregivers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The PRISMA flow chart for reporting the study screening process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hoffmann F, Rodrigues R. Informal carers: who takes care of them? Vienna: European Centre For Social Welfare Policy and Research; 2010.
    1. European Commission . Informal care in Europe. Exploring formalization, availability and quality. 2018.
    1. National Alliance for Caregiving & AARP Public Policy Institute . Caregiving in the U.S. Research report. 2015.
    1. Brody EM. Women in the middle, their parent-care years. Fam Relat. 1990;39:471–472.
    1. Fruhauf CA, Jarrott SE, Allen KR. Grandchildren’s perceptions of caring for grandparents. J Fam Issues. 2006;27(7):887–911.

Publication types