Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 5;10(1):49.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01598-5.

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia: a scoping review protocol

Wei Qi Koh  1 , Simone Anna Felding  2 , Elaine Toomey  3 , Dympna Casey  4
Affiliations

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia: a scoping review protocol

Wei Qi Koh et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial health issues such as depression and social isolation are an important cause of morbidity and premature mortality for older adults and people with dementia. Social robots are promising technological innovations to deliver effective psychosocial interventions to promote psychosocial wellbeing. Studies have reported positive findings regarding this technology on the psychosocial health of older adults and people with dementia. However, despite positive findings of the effects of social robots for older adults and people with dementia, little is known about factors affecting their implementation in practice.

Methods: This study follows Arksey and O'Malley's approach and methodological enhancement by Levac et al. Relevant articles will be identified by searching electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Compendex and PubMed. A two-phase screening process will be undertaken by two independent reviewers to determine articles' inclusion. Findings will be summarised and reported thematically based on domains in the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) and presented narratively. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will guide the reporting of findings.

Discussion: Reporting the protocol in advance of conducting the review will ensure that rigorous and transparent methodological approach is undertaken. The outcomes of the review include identifying variants in terminologies used to describe implementation, identifying the scope of the literature regarding the barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of social robots and identifying research gaps to guide further empirical research in this field. This evidence synthesis constitutes part of a bigger project aimed to develop implementation guidelines for social robotics for older adults with dementia. Since the methodological process consists of reviewing and collecting data from publicly available data, this study does not require approval from a research ethics board.

Scoping review registration: Our protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/2x3y9/ ) as an open access article, under the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC-4.0) license, which allows others to distribute, remix, adapt and build on this work on a non-commercial basis, and license their derivative work using different terms, on the basis that the original basis is properly cited and the use is non-commercial ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ).

Keywords: Barriers; Dementia; Facilitators; Implementation; Older adults; Social robots.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC. Social isolation and health, with an emphasis on underlying mechanisms. Perspect Biol Med. 2003;46(3):S39–S52. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2003.0049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coyle CE, Dugan E. Social isolation, loneliness and health among older adults. J Aging Health. 2012;24(8):1346–1363. doi: 10.1177/0898264312460275. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moyle W, Kellett U, Ballantyne A, Gracia N. Dementia and loneliness: an Australian perspective. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(9-10):1445–1453. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03549.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dröes R-M, Boelens-Van Der Knoop EC, Bos J, Meihuizen L, Ettema TP, Gerritsen DL, et al. Quality of life in dementia in perspective: an explorative study of variations in opinions among people with dementia and their professional caregivers, and in literature. Dementia. 2006;5(4):533–558. doi: 10.1177/1471301206069929. - DOI
    1. Milne A. The ‘D’ word: Reflections on the relationship between stigma, discrimination and dementia. J Ment Health. 2010;19(3):227–33. doi: 10.3109/09638231003728166. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types