Health service organisation impact on lower extremity amputations in people with type 2 diabetes with foot ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33547497
- PMCID: PMC7864802
- DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01662-x
Health service organisation impact on lower extremity amputations in people with type 2 diabetes with foot ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Aims: Despite the evidence available on the epidemiology of diabetic foot ulcers and associated complications, it is not clear how specific organizational aspects of health care systems can positively affect their clinical trajectory. We aim to evaluate the impact of organizational aspects of care on lower extremity amputation rates among people with type 2 diabetes affected by foot ulcers.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature published between 1999 and 2019, using the following key terms as search criteria: people with type 2 diabetes, diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcer, treated with specific processes and care pathways, and LEA as primary outcome. Overall results were reported as pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals obtained using fixed and random effects models.
Results: A total of 57 studies were found eligible, highlighting the following arrangements: dedicated teams, care pathways and protocols, multidisciplinary teams, and combined interventions. Among them, seven studies qualified for a meta-analysis. According to the random effects model, interventions including any of the four arrangements were associated with a 29% reduced risk of any type of lower extremity amputation (OR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.52-0.96). The effect was larger when focusing on major LEAs alone, leading to a 48% risk reduction (OR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.91).
Conclusions: Specific organizational arrangements including multidisciplinary teams and care pathways can prevent half of the amputations in people with diabetes and foot ulcers. Further studies using standardized criteria are needed to investigate the cost-effectiveness to facilitate wider implementation of improved organizational arrangements. Similarly, research should identify specific roadblocks to translating evidence into action. These may be structures and processes at the health system level, e.g. availability of professionals with the right skillset, reimbursement mechanisms, and clear organizational intervention implementation guidelines.
Keywords: Diabetic foot ulcers; Health service organization; Lower extremity amputation; Type 2 diabetes.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Heiss reports research grants from the University of Surrey and the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/V00980X/1) outside the submitted work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Reducing major lower extremity amputations after the introduction of a multidisciplinary team for the diabetic foot.Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2014 Mar;13(1):22-6. doi: 10.1177/1534734614521234. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2014. PMID: 24659624
-
Clinical profiles of diabetic foot ulcer patients undergoing major limb amputation at a tertiary care center in North-eastern Tanzania.BMC Surg. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01051-3. BMC Surg. 2021. PMID: 33435942 Free PMC article.
-
Four-fold increase in foot ulcers in type 2 diabetic subjects without an increase in major amputations by a multidisciplinary setting.Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009 Mar;83(3):353-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.11.025. Epub 2008 Dec 23. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009. PMID: 19108928
-
The costs of diabetic foot: the economic case for the limb salvage team.J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3 Suppl):17S-22S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.003. J Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20804928 Review.
-
Effect of contact with podiatry in a team approach context on diabetic foot ulcer and lower extremity amputation: systematic review and meta-analysis.J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Mar 20;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-0380-8. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020. PMID: 32192509 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Development of the Italian clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome: design and methodological aspects.Acta Diabetol. 2023 Nov;60(11):1449-1469. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02150-8. Epub 2023 Jul 25. Acta Diabetol. 2023. PMID: 37491605
-
Patient reported experiences and readmissions for people with diabetes-related foot disease admitted to public hospitals, New South Wales, Australia, 2019-2022.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0314895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314895. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39637833 Free PMC article.
-
Research priorities to prevent and treat diabetic foot ulcers-A digital James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.Diabet Med. 2022 Nov;39(11):e14947. doi: 10.1111/dme.14947. Epub 2022 Sep 7. Diabet Med. 2022. PMID: 36054410 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of a multidisciplinary team approach in patients with diabetic foot ulcers on major adverse limb events (MALEs): systematic review and meta-analysis for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.Acta Diabetol. 2024 May;61(5):543-553. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02246-9. Epub 2024 Mar 10. Acta Diabetol. 2024. PMID: 38461443
-
The Use of mHealth Apps for the Assessment and Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Health Outcomes: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 4;25:e47608. doi: 10.2196/47608. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37792467 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carinci F, et al. Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2015;27:137–146. - PubMed
-
- Carinci F, Uccioli L, Massi Benedetti M, Klazinga NS. An in-depth assessment of diabetes-related lower extremity amputation rates 2000–2013 delivered by twenty-one countries for the data collection 2015 of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Acta Diabetol. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01423-5. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical