Performance of two clinical scales to assess quality of life in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome

Abstract

Objective: We directly compared the Villalta scale and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) to determine which of the two measures would be better at capturing clinically important cases of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and PTS severity compared with patient-reported quality of life (QOL) scores.

Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the ATTRACT (acute venous thrombosis: thrombus removal with adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis) trial study population. We calculated the correlations of the Villalta scores and VCSSs with QOL scores (short-form 36-item health survey [SF-36] physical component summary [PCS] and mental component summary [MCS]; and VEINES [venous insufficiency epidemiological and economic study]-QOL/symptom [VEINES-QOL/Sym] questionnaire) at each study visit (6, 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up). The correlation of the random intercept (mean scores) and random slope (rate of change of the scores) among the Villalta scores, VCSS, and VEINES-QOL/Sym scores was assessed using a multivariate longitudinal model.

Results: The median correlation between Villalta scores and VCSSs was 0.72. The median correlation between the Villalta scores and VEINES-QOL and VEINES-Sym scores at all follow-up visits was -0.68 and -0.71, respectively. The median correlation between the Villalta scores and SF-36 PCS and MCS scores was -0.51 and -0.31, respectively. For the VCSSs, the median correlation with the VEINES-QOL and VEINES-Sym scores at all follow-up visits was -0.39 and -0.41, respectively. The median correlation between the VCSSs and SF-36 PCS and MCS scores was -0.32 and -0.13, respectively. The correlations between the random effects in the multivariate longitudinal models showed a similar pattern. The effect of covariate adjustment by age, sex, and body mass index was minor.

Conclusions: The Villalta scores and VCSSs correlated strongly. The Villalta scale showed a substantially greater correlation with venous disease-specific and general QOL scores compared with the correlation with the VCSS. Our findings suggest that when a single scale is used to assess for clinically meaningful PTS, the Villalta scale will better capture the effects of PTS on patient-reported QOL.

Keywords: Post-thrombotic syndrome; Quality of life; Randomized trial; Venous Clinical Severity Score; Villalta scale.

Figure 1:. Pearson’s Correlations among Villalta Scores, VCSS Scores and QOL scores by Visit

VCSS = Venous Clinical Severity Score, VQOL = Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-QoL Score, VSym = Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-QoL Symptom Score, MCS = Short-Form Health Survey-36 Mental Component Score, PCS = Short-Form Health Survey-36 Physical Component Score

Figure 2:. Mean Villalta Score by VCSS Severity Category, by Follow-up Visit

*P-value from ANOVA testing

Figure 3:. Mean VCSS Score by Villalta Severity Category, by Follow-up Visit

*P-value from ANOVA testing