Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):305.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10337-3.

Is there a health inequality in gambling related harms? A systematic review

Affiliations

Is there a health inequality in gambling related harms? A systematic review

Jodie N Raybould et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Here we present a systematic review of the existing research into gambling harms, in order to determine whether there are differences in the presentation of these across demographic groups such as age, gender, culture, and socioeconomic status, or gambling behaviour categories such as risk severity and participation frequency.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Inclusion criteria were: 1) focus on gambling harms; 2) focus on harms to the gambler rather than affected others; 3) discussion of specific listed harms and not just harms in general terms. Exclusion criteria were: 1) research of non-human subjects; 2) not written in English; 3) not an empirical study; 4) not available as a full article.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search using the Web of Science and Scopus databases in August 2020. Assessment of quality took place using Standard Quality Assessment Criteria.

Results: A total of 59 studies published between 1994 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria. These were categorised into thematic groups for comparison and discussion. There were replicated differences found in groups defined by age, socioeconomic status, education level, ethnicity and culture, risk severity, and gambling behaviours.

Conclusion: Harms appear to be dependent on specific social, demographic and environmental conditions that suggests there is a health inequality in gambling related harms. Further investigation is required to develop standardised measurement tools and to understand confounding variables and co-morbidities. With a robust understanding of harms distribution in the population, Primary Care Workers will be better equipped to identify those who are at risk, or who are showing signs of Gambling Disorder, and to target prevention and intervention programmes appropriately.

Keywords: Age; Culture; Gambling; Gambling behaviour; Gambling disorder; Gambling harms; Gender; Harms; Harms measures; Health inequality; Online gambling; Pathological gambling; Problem gambling; Risk severity; Socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-P) Flowchart of Exclusions [37]

References

    1. Abbott M, Binde P, Clark L, Hodgins DC, Johnson M, Manitowabi D, et al. Conceptual framework of harmful gambling: an international collaboration. 3rd ed: Gambling Research Exchange Ontario (GREO); 2018. 10.33684/CFHG3.en. https://www.greo.ca/Modules/EvidenceCentre/Details/conceptual-framework-....
    1. Wardle H, Reith G, Best D, McDaid D, Platt S. Measuring gambling-related harms: a framework for action. Version 0.5. Birmingham: Gambling Commission; 2018. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/89248/.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.
    1. Gambling Commission . Gambling Participation in 2018 Behaviour Awareness and Attitudes. 2019.
    1. Abbott M. Do EGMS and problem gambling go together like a horse and carriage? Gambl Res. 2006;18(1):7–38.

Publication types