Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Apr;137(4):790-5.
doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.4.790.

Oxygen consumption during spontaneous ventilation with acute lung injury in anesthetized pigs

Affiliations

Oxygen consumption during spontaneous ventilation with acute lung injury in anesthetized pigs

M C Stock et al. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Apr.

Abstract

Acute lung injury causes a restrictive pulmonary defect, decreases lung compliance, and increases the work of breathing. We wished to determine the oxygen cost of the increased elastic work of breathing associated with acute lung injury. Extracorporeal venous circulation with a membrane lung was used to extract CO2 and to induce apnea in 14 anesthetized pigs. Data were collected during 4 experimental states: during spontaneous ventilation and apnea when the animals' lungs were normal, and after acute lung injury developed because of oleic acid administration. Acute lung injury decreased lung compliance from 101 +/- 79 (mean +/- SD) to 52 +/- 25 ml/cm H2O (p less than 0.04), and increased the elastic work of breathing from 700 +/- 590 to 1,060 +/- 630 ml.cm H2O (p = 0.01). During spontaneous ventilation, the increases in total O2 consumption and the O2 cost of breathing caused by acute lung injury were sufficiently small as to be undetectable, and, therefore, less than 3 to 4% of basal O2 consumption despite markedly increased elastic work and ventilatory power requirements. The increase in O2 consumption imposed by acute lung injury was small enough (less than 3 to 4% of total O2 consumption) that it appears to be clinically insignificant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources